Commons Sense

House of Commons · Ministers' Questions

Joint Expeditionary Force

Monday 24 March 2025 · 1 question

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Answered 0 Partly answered 1 Not answered 0

Key points

  • Jamie Stone thanked the Minister for his answer regarding the joint expeditionary force.
  • The Minister highlighted the importance of procurement work with allies for better interoperability and interchangeability of equipment.
  • The Minister mentioned specific equipment like P-8s, F-35s, and potentially Type 26 frigates in the context of allied procurement.

Topics (select to filter)

Questions & Answers

Q1 Jamie Stone Lib Dem Caithness, Sutherland and Easter Ross
Context

Discussions on the joint expeditionary force with European counterparts. The MP references personal experience in Norway during the armed forces parliamentary scheme.

Question

I thank the Minister for his answer. Clearly we have a particularly good relationship with the countries that make up the joint expeditionary force. Some of the kit that the Norwegians had was particularly impressive, as I am sure the Minister would agree. Could I press him on what work we can do with the countries in the joint expeditionary force on procurement, design and perhaps development of equipment?

Answer from The Minister for the Armed Forces (Luke Pollard)

Just to clarify for the House, they were different snowdrifts at different times—otherwise there could be stories! The more procurement we can do with our allies, the better—not only in how interoperable the equipment will be but in its interchangeability. With P-8s, F-35s and potentially Type 26 frigates being shared by common nations in the High North, there is a huge opportunity to work together more closely, creating more jobs and more effective deterrents against Russian aggression.

Partly answered

Not addressed: Specific procurement details were not provided

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email