Context
The MP notes concerns about EWS1 forms issued by Tri Fire, suggesting that both the EWS1 form and fire risk assessments may be invalid or fraudulent in many cases, particularly affecting leaseholders.
Question
In an answer to a written parliamentary question last week, the Minister suggested that if a leaseholder cannot use an EWS1 fire safety certificate to progress the sale and purchase of their home, they should use the fire risk assessment. However, in many cases, including in my constituency, both the EWS1 form and the fire risk assessment are most likely invalid, if not fraudulent. In those circumstances, what measures can be taken to prioritise fire risk assessments for those leaseholders? What can be done to protect leaseholders from the additional costs of conducting another fire safety assessment after the one that they conducted in good faith?
Answer from The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government (Alex Norris)
If the building is in one of the Government-backed schemes, such as the cladding safety scheme, the fire risk assessment will have been quality assured by the Government, which will provide assurance. If it is covered by the developer contract, it will have been audited by the Department, so that ought to give cover as well. If neither of those things is the case, I am more than happy to talk to the hon. Lady about how to give residents surety so that they can evidence to lenders that their building is safe.
Not addressed: The specific costs and measures for prioritising fire risk assessments were not addressed.
Was this summary accurate? Tell us
How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)