Commons Sense

House of Commons · Ministers' Questions

Sri Lanka

Tuesday 25 February 2025 · 1 question

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Answered 0 Partly answered 1 Not answered 0

Key points

  • Mr Paul Kohler questioned the UK Government on accountability for war crimes in Sri Lanka.
  • The Foreign Secretary mentioned a resolution on Sri Lanka passed in the UN Human Rights Council in October 2024.
  • The resolution renewed the mandate of the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights to report on Sri Lanka.

Topics (select to filter)

Questions & Answers

Q1 Paul Kohler Lib Dem Wimbledon
Context

Following the end of the civil war in Sri Lanka over 15 years ago, there has been ongoing concern about accountability for alleged war crimes, including targeting civilians and sexual violence. The UK government previously called for sanctions against individuals suspected of these acts.

Question

It is over 15 years since the end of the bloody civil war in Sri Lanka, but those responsible for the many war crimes committed during that conflict, including the targeting of civilians and sexual violence, have still not been held accountable. In opposition, the Foreign Secretary called on the Government to follow the example of our allies, including the US and Canada, in imposing sanctions against individuals suspected of committing these appalling acts. Now he is in government, will he commit to finally doing so?

Answer from The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs (Catherine West)

In October 2024, the UK and our core group partners got a resolution on Sri Lanka in the UN Human Rights Council, outlining just what the hon. Member says. It renewed the mandate of the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights to report regularly on Sri Lanka, and to protect and preserve evidence to use in future accountability processes. We consider a range of justice and accountability options, including sanctions, and keep evidence for any potential designations under close review.

Partly answered

Not addressed: Commitment to impose specific sanctions was not provided

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)