Context
Rolling stock leasing companies are taking more than £1 billion in profit from the railway network. This could be reinvested into improvements.
Question
At the moment, the rolling stock leasing companies take more than £1 billion of profit out of the railway. A substantial amount of that could be reinvested in improving the railway network. With the Bill for Great British Railways due to come to Parliament soon, will the Secretary of State look seriously at alternative financing models such as EUROFIMA—the European company for the financing of railroad rolling stock—or even a publicly owned ROSCO that could deliver rolling stock at a considerably lower price? Indeed, will she be more socialist and more ambitious with the Bill?
Answer from The Secretary of State for Transport (Heidi Alexander)
I assure the hon. Gentleman that I do not lack any ambition when it comes to Great British Railways. It would cost billions in taxpayers’ money to buy existing rolling stock, at a time when there are many pressures on the public purse. My officials have been engaging regularly with EUROFIMA to consider the potential for UK membership and how EUROFIMA finance could be deployed in the UK.
Not addressed: The cost of buying existing rolling stock
How: It Would Cost Billions In Taxpayers’ Money
Was this summary accurate? Tell us
How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)