Commons Sense

House of Commons · Ministers' Questions

North-east: Support for Businesses

Thursday 30 January 2025 · 1 question

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Answered 0 Partly answered 1 Not answered 0

Key points

  • Ministerial support was extended to projects across the UK, but the north-east did not receive similar support.
  • Ian Lavery questioned why businesses in Blyth and Ashington constituency were not receiving the same level of support as other regions.
  • The Government aims to create high-paid, well-skilled jobs in tech and other sectors to benefit the north-east economy.

Topics (select to filter)

Questions & Answers

Q1 Ian Lavery Lab Blyth and Ashington
Context

The region has faced economic challenges due to previous government policies. The north-east was particularly affected by past administrations, with a need for substantial support for local businesses.

Question

Yesterday saw full-throated Government support for projects across the UK, but not so much for the north-east. The region was decimated by 14 years of Tory Government, and that cannot be repeated. What will the Government do to ensure that businesses in my Blyth and Ashington constituency can play their part in the cutting-edge technologies of the future and see improved investment, which will create much-needed jobs with good wages and terms and conditions?

Answer from The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Business and Trade (Justin Madders)

I am at one with my hon. Friend in wanting all parts of the country, especially the north-west and the north-east, to have high-paid, well-skilled, good jobs, in tech sectors in particular, but also in other areas where we can see great advantage for the economy. The local skills improvement plan for the north-east will help, and the excellent facilities at Blyth’s Energy Central Learning Hub are supported by over £6 million of Government funding. That is already developing sector skills in a real-world port setting.

Partly answered

Not addressed: The specific ask for improved investment and job creation with good terms and conditions was not addressed directly, focusing instead on existing initiatives.

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)