Context
The situation where 10% of offenders account for 50% of all offences, blighting communities. The Policy Exchange report suggests mandatory two-year sentences for hyper-prolific offenders.
Question
I believe in second chances, but the Policy Exchange report found that hyper-prolific offenders—those with more than 45 previous convictions—are sent to prison on fewer than half of occasions they are convicted of a subsequent indictable or either-way offence. Given their high number of crimes affecting least affluent constituents, what consideration have the Government given to the report’s recommendations, particularly on introducing a mandatory two-year sentence for hyper-prolific offenders?
Answer from Shabana Mahmood (The Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice)
I agree that we need a specific strategy for dealing with prolific offenders, but different organisations use different definitions of what counts as a prolific offender or hyper-prolific offender. I have asked David Gauke to look specifically at this cohort of offenders in the independent sentencing review. The point is to think about interventions that will make the biggest difference so we can cut crime and have fewer victims.
Not addressed: The specific recommendation for a mandatory two-year sentence was not addressed
How: Referral To Independent Review
Was this summary accurate? Tell us
How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)