Context
The Infected Blood Compensation Authority has made progress but legal representatives are concerned about various aspects of the scheme including authority, appeals process and victim involvement in oversight board.
Question
I thank the right hon. Gentleman for his update to the House. I note the press release that went out yesterday, and no doubt there will be another one on 5 March, the day before the next Cabinet Office questions. However, I want to be constructive in my approach; I, too, will be visiting the Infected Blood Compensation Authority in Newcastle, next Thursday. The legal representatives of the complex web of stakeholders in the infected blood and affected communities remain concerned about the status of the arm’s length body, the appeals process and the role of victims in the oversight board. I am absolutely clear that the Infected Blood Compensation Authority has the necessary authority and will work through those issues. I urge the Minister to work with and reassure the victims’ representatives, so that the lawyers can be more constructive in supporting these people along this difficult pathway.
Answer from Nick Thomas-Symonds (Paymaster General and Minister for the Cabinet Office)
Yes, the right hon. Gentleman is absolutely right. I look forward to the former Paymaster General’s reflections after his visit next week. I was delighted yesterday to meet the user consultants— three victims; two infected, one affected—who are certainly making their voice heard at the Infected Blood Compensation Authority. That voice of victims is hugely important, as is the constructive approach the right hon. Gentleman has indicated.
Not addressed: The Minister did not provide specific reassurances about working with legal representatives to address concerns about authority and appeals process.
How: Constructive Approach, Voice Of Victims
Was this summary accurate? Tell us
How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)