Commons Sense

House of Commons · Ministers' Questions

Windrush: Victim Support

Monday 13 January 2025 · 1 question

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Answered 0 Partly answered 1 Not answered 0

Key points

  • Ministerial Questions on Windrush: Victim Support were held on 2025-01-13
  • Harpreet Uppal raised concerns about lack of legal aid for Windrush generation members applying for compensation
  • The Minister committed to making changes to improve accessibility and support for compensation claims

Topics (select to filter)

Questions & Answers

Context

The Windrush generation faces significant barriers in accessing compensation for the injustices they suffered, including a lack of legal aid to navigate complex claims processes. A constituent has reported difficulties in submitting a claim.

Question

Members of the Windrush generation who struggle to submit compensation claims do not have access to legal aid, leaving them unable to navigate the complex process. I have recently been contacted by a constituent who is struggling to navigate the claims process, and has no other support available to him. What steps is the Minister taking to tackle those barriers, and will she commit to providing additional support to ensure that every eligible individual can access the scheme, regardless of their capacity or circumstances?

Answer from The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for the Home Department (Seema Malhotra)

My hon. Friend makes an important point. We are committed to making changes so that the scheme is accessible and so victims of the Windrush scandal are far better supported in applying for compensation. It is why, in July, we brought in a single named caseworker approach to streamline the process, improve consistency and remove duplication, and it is why we announced £1.5 million of grant funding for organisations to provide extra support for applicants.

Partly answered

Not addressed: The specific commitment to provide additional direct legal aid or practical support was not explicitly made.

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)