Commons Sense

House of Commons · Ministers' Questions

Roadworks: Preventing Road Closures

Thursday 9 January 2025 · 1 question

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Answered 0 Partly answered 1 Not answered 0

Key points

  • Lewis Cocking raised concerns about excessive road closures and temporary traffic lights in his constituency.
  • The Minister acknowledged legitimate reasons for unoccupied road works, such as material curing or gas venting.
  • The Minister stated that unnecessary use of emergency procedures by utility companies should be minimized.

Topics (select to filter)

Questions & Answers

Q1 Lewis Cocking Con Broxbourne
Context

Drivers in Broxbourne are experiencing frequent and prolonged road closures without clear justification, leading to frustration among local residents.

Question

I draw Members’ attention to my entry in the Register of Members’ Financial Interests. Drivers in my constituency are sick to death of the endless road closures and temporary traffic lights when no works are taking place. Will the Minister demand that utility companies do everything in their power to get roads open as quickly as possible, particularly when they have dug them up under the emergency procedure?

Answer from The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Transport (Lilian Greenwood)

Absolutely. There can be legitimate reasons why works are sometimes left unoccupied—for example, when they are waiting for materials to cure or gas to vent—but I take the hon. Member’s point, particularly where utilities are using emergency procedures unnecessarily. We have examined Street Manager data and spoken to industry representatives and found no evidence of misuse. None the less, given the number of urgent works—which are, of course, not unrelated to the appalling state of our roads left by the previous Government—we will see what more can be done to ensure that these works are managed and communicated to road users properly.

Partly answered

Not addressed: The Minister acknowledged the issue but did not provide a specific commitment or timeline for action beyond indicating an ongoing review.

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email