Commons Sense

House of Commons · Ministers' Questions

Childcare Accessibility

Monday 4 November 2024 · 3 questions

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

Read the full transcript on Parliament.uk

At a glance

Answered 0 Partly answered 2 Not answered 0

Key points

  • Ensuring parents have access to affordable and high-quality childcare is a priority for the Government.
  • The Department is helping the workforce to develop skills and confidence to work effectively with children with SEND.
  • The Government aims to reform the childcare system to ensure it is fit for purpose and of high quality for all young people.

Topics (select to filter)

Questions & Answers

Q1 Jennifer Craft Lab Thurrock
Children & Families
Context

MP concerned about lack of accessible childcare in her constituency.

Question

What steps she is taking to make childcare more accessible?

Answer from Stephen Morgan

Ensuring that parents have access to affordable and high-quality childcare is a priority for this Government. We will focus on greater opportunities for every family to access early education, and on greater opportunities for children to thrive and develop. As an initial step, we have announced the bidding round for the first 300 school-based nurseries from next September.

Partly answered

Not addressed: Specific details on how childcare will be made more accessible were not provided.

How: Focus On, Greater Opportunities

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Q2 Jennifer Craft Lab Thurrock
Children & Families
Context

Early years providers struggle to meet the needs of children with special educational needs and disabilities (SEND).

Question

Many early years providers struggle to meet the needs of children with SEND. Lack of funds, lack of training and lack of specialist staff often mean that those that do provide a good or excellent service quickly become over-subscribed. What steps is the Department taking to reassure parents and carers of children with SEND that those children will have access to the childcare or early years provision in their areas that meets their needs?

Answer from Stephen Morgan

We are helping members of the workforce to develop the skills and confidence that will enable them to work effectively with children with SEND, and reviewing early years funding arrangements to ensure that they meet the needs of those children. I should be happy to meet my hon. Friend or visit her constituency to understand the issues that her local providers are facing.

Partly answered

Not addressed: Specific steps and timeline for ensuring adequate support were not detailed.

How: Helping Members, Reviewing Arrangements

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Q3 Luke Evans Con Hinckley and Bosworth
Children & Families
Context

Campaigner Martin Lewis has highlighted issues affecting single parents in childcare.

Question

Martin Lewis has long campaigned for changes in childcare, in particular because the way in which it is set up can damage single parents. There is an obvious cliff edge. The last Government proposed a consultation on thresholds for households being taken as one, but this Government seem to have scrapped that in the Budget. Will Ministers be speaking to the Treasury to decide how they will overcome this cliff edge that affects so many single parents?

Answer from Stephen Morgan

I thank the hon. Member for his question. We have a child-centred Government, and early years is a priority for the Secretary of State. We will focus on reforming the childcare system to ensure that it is fit for purpose for the future and of high quality for all young people. We are taking the sector's concerns seriously, and we want to ensure there is a sustainable system going forward.

Not addressed: Specific actions or commitments to address childcare issues for single parents were not provided.

How: Reforming The Childcare System, Taking Seriously

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)