Commons Sense

House of Commons · Ministers' Questions

Support for Jurors

Tuesday 14 May 2024 · 2 questions

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Answered 0 Partly answered 2 Not answered 0

Key points

  • Sarah Dyke questioned the adequacy of support available to jurors affected by serving on a jury.
  • Jurors dealing with violent crimes feel they lack sufficient aftercare.
  • The Government announced intentions to test counselling sessions for jurors.

Topics (select to filter)

Questions & Answers

Q1 Sarah Dyke Lib Dem Glastonbury and Somerton
Context

Jurors dealing with extremely violent crimes often feel insufficient aftercare is available to deal with their experiences, despite being advised to seek counselling through their GP or the Samaritans.

Question

If he will make an assessment of the adequacy of support available to jurors who have been adversely affected by sitting on a jury. Currently, jurors dealing with extremely violent crimes, witnessing ever-increasingly sophisticated and graphic material, often feel that they do not have sufficient aftercare to deal with their experiences.

Answer from Gareth Bacon

Juries are a vital part of our criminal justice system, and jury service is an important civic duty. We want to do everything we can to help jurors feel supported as they undertake that important role, which is why the Government have announced our intention to test counselling sessions for jurors who suffer mental and emotional strain following a trial. That pilot will commence in 15 courts this summer. I thank the hon. Lady for her question, which is extremely relevant. As she can imagine, there have been extensive discussions between the Department and the judiciary about this. The senior presiding judge has approved the test sites for the pilot that I have just discussed. Support of the type that we are providing in the pilot has not been provided before, so the pilot itself will inform an essential part of the judgment we make on whether and how we can carry on.

Partly answered

Not addressed: The specific ask regarding discussions about increasing post-trial support was acknowledged but no concrete commitments or timelines were given beyond mentioning a pilot programme.

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Q2 Sarah Dyke Lib Dem Glastonbury and Somerton
Context

Jurors dealing with extremely violent crimes often feel insufficient aftercare is available to deal with their experiences, despite being advised to seek counselling through their GP or the Samaritans.

Question

Currently, jurors dealing with extremely violent crimes, witnessing ever-increasingly sophisticated and graphic material, often feel that they do not have sufficient aftercare to deal with their experiences. They are advised to seek counselling only with their GP or the Samaritans. What discussions has the Minister had on increasing the amount of post-trial support for jurors when they have faced potentially traumatic levels of stress as a result of their experience?

Answer from Gareth Bacon

Juries are a vital part of our criminal justice system, and jury service is an important civic duty. We want to do everything we can to help jurors feel supported as they undertake that important role, which is why the Government have announced our intention to test counselling sessions for jurors who suffer mental and emotional strain following a trial. That pilot will commence in 15 courts this summer. I thank the hon. Lady for her question, which is extremely relevant. As she can imagine, there have been extensive discussions between the Department and the judiciary about this. The senior presiding judge has approved the test sites for the pilot that I have just discussed. Support of the type that we are providing in the pilot has not been provided before, so the pilot itself will inform an essential part of the judgment we make on whether and how we can carry on.

Partly answered

Not addressed: The specific ask regarding discussions about increasing post-trial support was acknowledged but no concrete commitments or timelines were given beyond mentioning a pilot programme.

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)