Commons Sense

House of Commons · Ministers' Questions

National Symbols: Regulation

Thursday 18 April 2024 · 3 questions

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Answered 0 Partly answered 2 Not answered 0

Key points

  • The correct use of many national symbols, such as the royal arms and the Government coat of arms, is already subject to Government regulation.
  • The Union Jack should remain a unifying symbol for the whole country without changes.
  • The Minister does not know how to answer questions about preventing organizations from using images of the King in their propaganda.

Topics (select to filter)

Questions & Answers

Q1 Andrew Rosindell Reform Romford
Context

The question addresses concerns about the use and misuse of national symbols such as the cross of St George and the Union Jack by certain organisations.

Question

If she will make an assessment of the potential merits of bringing forward legislative proposals to regulate the use of national symbols by commercial and other entities. I think many people would be quite angered by the way certain national organisations have tried to change our national flags, the cross of St George and the Union Jack. Is it not time that we protected and cherished our national symbols by appointing a Minister of the Crown from the Cabinet Office to oversee that? Will the Minister also look at the Union Flag Bill of 2008, which would enshrine in legislation the protection of our cherished national flag?

Answer from Stuart Andrew

The correct use of many national symbols, such as royal names, state emblems, the royal arms and the Government coat of arms, is already subject to Government regulation. The Union Jack should be a unifying symbol for the whole country. It has looked the way it has for the past several hundred years and I see no point in messing around with it. I am not sure that we need legislation; we just need some common sense.

Partly answered

Not addressed: The specific ask to appoint a Minister of the Crown from the Cabinet Office to oversee the protection of national symbols was not directly addressed, and no concrete steps were outlined for legislative proposals.

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Q2 Andrew Rosindell Reform Romford
Context

The question focuses on the potential misuse and alteration of national flags such as the cross of St George and the Union Jack by certain organisations.

Question

I think many people would be quite angered by the way certain national organisations have tried to change our national flags, the cross of St George and the Union Jack. Is it not time that we protected and cherished our national symbols by appointing a Minister of the Crown from the Cabinet Office to oversee that? Will the Minister also look at the Union Flag Bill of 2008, which would enshrine in legislation the protection of our cherished national flag?

Answer from Stuart Andrew

The Union Jack should be a unifying symbol for the whole country. It has looked the way it has for the past several hundred years and I see no point in messing around with it. I am not sure that we need legislation; we just need some common sense.

Partly answered

Not addressed: The specific ask to appoint a Minister of the Crown from the Cabinet Office to oversee the protection of national symbols was not directly addressed, and no concrete steps were outlined for legislative proposals.

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Context

The question addresses the potential misuse of royal imagery by organisations such as political parties.

Question

Would Ministers be equally keen to prevent organisations, such as political parties, using images of His Majesty the King in their propaganda?

Answer from Stuart Andrew

I do not know how to answer that question, if I am honest! [Laughter.] Our party has always been proud to use the Union Jack, because we are a proud Unionist party, and we will always be proud to support the royal family.

Not addressed: The specific ask about preventing misuse of the King's images by political parties was not addressed. Instead, the answerer focused on the positive use of the Union Jack by their own party.

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)