Context
The recent deadly rail crash in India, with over 288 deaths and hundreds injured, has highlighted railway safety issues. In the UK, there are concerns about underperforming Avanti West Coast services.
Question
Whether he has had recent discussions with the Leader of the House on legislation to establish Great British Railways. On behalf of Opposition Members, may I associate myself with the Secretary of State's comments in respect of the people of India? In the north-west, we were hoping that the formation of GBR might have been on track by now to help us deal with the chronically underperforming Avanti West Coast, but we see no sign of the legislation. Parliament certainly has the time to deal with it—we finished after a couple of hours on Tuesday—and it is certainly not a question of money, as we know £50 million has already been spent on the project. What exactly is the problem with bringing the matter before the House? Is it a lack of political will, or is it a lack of competence?
Answer from Mark Harper
The Government remain committed to GBR. As I have said, we have already announced that the HQ will be in Derby. Many of the benefits can be achieved without legislation, and we are getting on with them. It is worth noting, based on statistics published this morning by the Office of Rail and Road, that we still face a massive challenge with the rail industry: leisure is now much more important than commuting and business; and passenger revenue is still 28% down on the pre-pandemic level. A successful railway needs to change to reflect passenger demand, and that is exactly what this Government are going to deliver.
Not addressed: The specific reasons for delay in legislation were not addressed
How: Legislation Benefits Can Be Achieved Without, We Are Getting On With Them
Was this summary accurate? Tell us
How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)