Commons Sense

House of Commons · Ministers' Questions

Household Energy Efficiency Measures

Tuesday 28 February 2023 · 8 questions

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Answered 2 Partly answered 6 Not answered 0

Key points

  • Government have made progress, with 47% of homes in England reaching the 2035 target of energy performance certificate level C and above, up from 14% in 2010.
  • Government committed 12.6 billion to campaigns to tackle radiator sludge and improve home energy efficiency.
  • Government extended the energy company obligation through its fourth phase, ECO4, with an additional 4 billion investment.

Topics (select to filter)

Questions & Answers

Context

The question arises from the government's efforts to encourage households to install energy efficiency measures.

Question

What steps he is taking to encourage households to install energy efficiency measures.

Answer from Grant Shapps

The Government have made good progress, with 47% of homes in England now having reached the Government's 2035 target of achieving energy performance certificate level C and above, which is up from 14% in 2010.

Answered
Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Context

A company in the questioner's constituency highlighted that dirty radiators increase energy bills by 7% and reduce heat effectiveness. The government's £25 million energy efficiency advice campaign does not include information on magnetic filtration.

Question

I want to talk about radiator sludge, as I went to see ADEY Innovation Ltd, a company in my constituency, where I learned that dirty radiators increase energy bills by 7% and people may be getting 47% less heat through poor water quality. Yet in the Government's £25 million energy efficiency advice campaign there is nowt about the benefits of magnetic filtration and other affordable things that companies such as ADEY Innovation offer households. Will my right hon. Friend agree to work with me to include this advice and meet to discuss this?

Answer from Grant Shapps

My hon. Friend is right to worry about radiator sludge, and I fully support her in her concerns. I am pleased to tell her that in this Parliament and into the next we have committed £12.6 billion to campaigns to ensure not just that we tackle the radiator sludge, but that we do things throughout homes to improve their insulation and other technologies. I would be happy to meet her.

Partly answered

Not addressed: The answer did not specifically commit to including magnetic filtration advice in the campaign

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Context

Retrofitting older homes can reduce carbon emissions, cut energy bills and bring new green jobs to the north. However, the costs are currently prohibitive.

Question

Retrofitting older homes can reduce carbon emissions, cut energy bills, make homes warmer, reduce reliance on gas and bring new green jobs to the north. However, the costs associated with retrofitting are currently prohibitive to achieving it on a large scale. What more can my right hon. Friend do to ensure that we bring down the cost of retrofitting homes?

Answer from Grant Shapps

My hon. Friend is right about the cost of doing this. I have described how we are getting towards half of homes having been improved, but he will be pleased to hear about the £4 billion extension of the energy company obligation through its fourth phase, ECO4, along with ECO+, which involves another £1 billion to assist with some of the economics of ensuring that all homes can be improved.

Answered
Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Q4 Derek Twigg Lab Widnes and Halewood
Context

Many constituents are struggling to pay their energy bills while energy companies make vast profits. There is a call for a windfall tax.

Question

Of course we all welcome as many energy efficiency measures as possible and encourage households to put them in place, but the fact remains that many middle-income and low-income constituents in my constituency are still struggling to pay their energy bills and are under great financial pressure. They are looking at how energy companies are making vast profits and now talking about giving vast bonuses to their chief executives and managers. People want something doing about that, and they want the Government and the energy companies to play their part more to ensure that an equal share is paid. We should have a windfall tax as well.

Answer from Grant Shapps

We have a windfall tax; it is at 75%, as opposed to just 19% for corporation tax elsewhere. It is worth explaining to the hon. Gentleman and to the House that the Government are currently paying about 50% of a typical household energy bill. Where are we getting that money from? We are largely getting it from taxing the gas and oil companies.

Partly answered

Not addressed: The answer did not specifically commit to implementing a windfall tax beyond acknowledging its existence

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Q5 Emma Hardy Lab Kingston upon Hull West and Haltemprice
Context

The previous coalition government cut the “green crap” leading to poorly insulated homes.

Question

Labour has a plan to upgrade our homes and eradicate fuel poverty with a warm homes plan to insulate 19 million homes over a decade. Does the Secretary of State regret the decision of the Liberal Democrat and Conservative coalition Government to cut the “green crap”, as a previous Prime Minister put it? That left people in poorly insulated homes and with expensive homes.

Answer from Grant Shapps

I explained in an earlier answer that we have gone from having just 14% of homes in 2010 with an energy rating of A to C to having 46% today. So it is clear that these plans have been working, and I have just talked about another £12.6 billion to finish off the job.

Partly answered

Not addressed: The answer did not directly address regret over past decisions but highlighted current efforts

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Context

There is a need for affordable advice on how to retrofit older homes.

Question

There are people in my constituency and across the country who need a lot of advice on how to retrofit older homes in an affordable way. The issue is not just the cost of retrofitting, but good advice on how to do that. I declare an interest: I happen to live in an older home where such advice may be needed. How will the Government help many people in my constituency, and indeed across the country, get that sort of advice on retrofitting older homes?

Answer from Grant Shapps

My hon. Friend, who is in a neighbouring constituency to mine, will be delighted to hear that the ECO+ scheme—another £1 billion—is specifically aimed at trying to get to homes in the private and commercial sector that are sometimes harder to decarbonise. It is one scheme that he will want to consider, but, without wishing to give too much away, he should watch this space.

Partly answered

Not addressed: The answer did not provide specific advice on retrofitting older homes beyond mentioning ECO+ scheme

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Q7 Bill Esterson Lab Sefton Central
Context

The current government's insulation rate is lower than in 2010. Labour has a plan to insulate 19 million homes over the next decade.

Question

We were insulating 10 times as many homes in 2010 as this Government are doing now. Everyone knows what has happened since the Secretary of State's Government decided to get rid of the “green crap”. Will he adopt Labour's plan to insulate 19 million homes over the next 10 years? It has the support of the Construction Leadership Council, the Federation of Master Builders and the building trade as a whole. It will create new jobs, cut bills and play its part in reducing carbon emissions. Will he do it?

Answer from Grant Shapps

This is one of those slightly odd parallel universes: we are saying that we have gone from just 14% to 46% of homes with A to C ratings—[Interruption.] My right hon. Friend the Minister of State suggests we might even be hitting 47%. I have also stood at this Dispatch Box and talked about £12.6 billion of investment to go even further, yet the Labour party will not just say, “That is very good, and we'll support you.”

Partly answered

Not addressed: The answer did not commit to adopting Labour's plan but highlighted government efforts

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Q8 Kerry McCarthy Lab Bristol East
Context

The current energy efficiency funding allocation falls short of the promise made in the manifesto, with a significant portion unspent. The Lords described take-up of the boiler upgrade scheme as “disappointingly low”.

Question

The fact is that, in the last Tory manifesto, the Government promised to spend £9.2 billion on energy efficiency, but they have allocated only £6.6 billion of that, over £2 billion of which has still not be spent. The Lords have just described take-up of the boiler upgrade scheme as “disappointingly low” and Government promotion of the scheme as “inadequate”. Does the Minister at least acknowledge that, at current insulation rates, it will take 92 years to retrofit the 19 million homes that need it and that if we are to bring down energy costs for people who are struggling with sky-high bills now, he needs to do a whole lot better?

Answer from Grant Shapps

There is still a considerable chunk of this Parliament left to run. As I have explained several times—I will say it again for the hon. Lady, who may have missed the point—we have already got pretty close to half the homes in this country being rated A to C —up from just 14%. We are well on our way to getting this job done. I appreciate her encouragement, but we will finish this off ourselves.

Partly answered

Not addressed: The answer did not acknowledge inadequacies in promotion or funding directly

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)