Commons Sense

House of Commons · Ministers' Questions

Asylum Applications: Backlog

Monday 6 February 2023 · 7 questions

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Answered 0 Partly answered 3 Not answered 0

Key points

  • Department committed to clearing asylum application backlog in 2023 and doubling caseworker numbers.
  • Local authorities receive funding of about 3,500 per asylum seeker under mandatory dispersal system.
  • Minister committed to working with local MP to clear hotel accommodation for asylum seekers quickly.

Topics (select to filter)

Questions & Answers

Q1 Vicky Foxcroft Lab Lewisham North
Context

The Department has committed to clearing the backlog of asylum applications and establishing a more streamlined process. However, progress details have not been fully disclosed.

Question

What recent progress her Department has made on reducing the backlog of asylum applications.

Answer from Robert Jenrick

We have committed to clearing the backlog of asylum applications over this year and to introducing a faster, more productive system. Since making that commitment at the end of 2022, we have made excellent progress: recruiting more caseworkers, working towards a doubling in their number, establishing dedicated caseworkers per nationality and designing a more streamlined process, which is already raising productivity substantially.

Partly answered

Not addressed: Did not specify exact timeline or figures for clearing the backlog.

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Q2 Rachel Hopkins Lab Luton South and South Bedfordshire
Context

Local councils like Luton Borough Council are facing disproportionate numbers of asylum seeker placements due to the backlog, adding strain on already stretched services.

Question

Luton is a compassionate town and is always proud to support those seeking sanctuary, but the backlog and delays in the Home Office's asylum system have led to Luton receiving a disproportionate number of dispersal placements in comparison with the rest of the east of England. Luton Borough Council's services are already stretched beyond their means, following a decade of Government cuts, so how is the Minister working with the Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities to ensure that councils receive clear funding settlements to cover the costs of the increased impact on local services?

Answer from Robert Jenrick

We provide funding for every asylum seeker who is in a local authority's care of about £3,500, and we work closely with local authorities through the mandatory dispersal system to make sure that each one plays a fair and equitable part. However, the answer to this problem is not more accommodation; it is stopping the boats and ensuring that we have some of the most robust laws in the world, so that those who come here illegally do not find a way to a life in the UK.

Not addressed: Did not address funding settlements or working with other departments for clear support measures.

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Q3 Vicky Foxcroft Lab Lewisham North
Context

A constituent from Syria applied for a job as a healthcare assistant but faced delays and documentation issues, highlighting the impact on NHS staff shortages.

Question

My constituent arrived here from Syria and claimed asylum in July 2021. He is a doctor and applied to volunteer with the covid vaccination programme, but was turned down because he had no documentation. After more than a year and many interventions by my office, he finally had his asylum interview and was given a job as a healthcare assistant, but that was delayed because he had to wait for his national insurance number. The NHS is crying out for staff. When will the Government sort this out?

Answer from Robert Jenrick

We are working to bring down the backlog of cases. Let me gently point out that the last Labour Government left a backlog of cases of not 450,000, as I said during the last session of Home Office questions, but 500,000, as has been shown by further research. So bad was the backlog that there was even a room colloquially known as the “room of doom” into which cases were put.

Not addressed: Did not address delays in documentation or NHS recruitment issues directly; instead criticised previous government.

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Context

Tensions are rising in the constituency due to the use of hotels for housing asylum seekers, leading to protests.

Question

Tensions in the community are rising in my constituency owing to the use of hotels to house asylum seekers in and around Cannock Chase and, in particular, in Bridgtown. There were protests in Cannock at the weekend. Will my right hon. Friend join me in thanking the local police, who are doing everything they can to respond to issues as they arise, and will he meet me to discuss the situation and ways in which we can alleviate the concerns of my constituents?

Answer from Robert Jenrick

I should be pleased to meet my right hon. Friend and work with her to ensure that that hotel, like others, is cleared as quickly as possible. I hope she will see from the work we are doing that we are straining every sinew to tackle this issue.

Partly answered

Not addressed: Did not provide specific plans or timelines for clearing hotels and addressing tensions.

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Q5 Julian Lewis Con New Forest East
Context

Concerns about whether applications from former Afghan interpreters are prioritised in the asylum process.

Question

One group with a strong claim to be here are the former interpreters in Afghanistan and other locally employed civilians who helped our armed forces. Will the Minister explain to the House whether such applications are caught up in the general collection of applications made by people who have come here illegally, or whether any form of priority and extra attention is given to those very deserving Afghan refugees?

Answer from Robert Jenrick

My right hon. Friend has raised an important issue. We take our moral commitment to those who supported our troops and our efforts in Afghanistan extremely seriously. We have helped more than 20,000 individuals to come to the UK, some before Operation Pitting, some during that operation and some since, under the Afghan relocations and assistance policy and subsequently the Afghan citizens resettlement scheme.

Partly answered

Not addressed: Did not specify current status or any prioritisation mechanism for new applications.

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Context

Ministers have made promises to deal with small boat crossings, but the issue has worsened since 2019.

Question

In 2019, the then Conservative Home Secretary said that she would end small boat crossings in a matter of months. Since then, the number of crossings has increased from 1,000 to 45,000, with the criminal gangs laughing all the way to the bank. Last year, Ministers promised that the Nationality and Borders Act 2022 would deal with the crisis, but in fact it has caused the asylum backlog to spiral out of control, forcing the British taxpayer to foot the bill for an extra £480 million in six-monthly accommodation costs. Now, Ministers are making all the same empty promises again. The Refugee Council says that the latest Government proposals will cost the taxpayer an extra £1 billion every six months, without anyone being returned anywhere. Does the Minister agree with Albert Einstein that doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results is a definition of madness?

Answer from Robert Jenrick

The problem with the hon. Gentleman and his colleagues is that they vote against every step that we bring forward. In an age of mass migration in which millions of people are on the move and want to come to our country, either as economic migrants or asylum shoppers, we have to take the most robust action we can.

Not addressed: Did not acknowledge ineffectiveness; instead criticised opposition.

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Context

A constituent had his immigration appeal allowed but has been waiting nine months for the decision to be implemented, unable to move on with his life. The Minister for Immigration was previously unable to provide a timescale or establish how long other individuals have waited.

Question

Delays even when decisions have been made are all too common. A constituent had his appeal allowed but is still waiting for the tribunal's decision to be implemented nine months later, unable to get on with his life. The Minister for Immigration was unable to provide a timescale or establish how long other individuals have waited. Can the answerer tell me what is the longest time that people like my constituent will have to wait, or is Home Office bureaucracy now completely out of control?

Answer from Robert Jenrick

The hon. Lady does not want us to tackle this issue because she believes in open borders. We want to take action to ensure that this country is not somewhere where economic migrants and asylum shoppers seek to come, which means suffusing deterrents throughout the system. She should support plans such as Rwanda and our efforts to bear down on illegal migrants. We will clear the backlog of cases over the course of this year.

Not addressed: The question about appeal delays was not directly addressed, instead focusing on immigration policy principles and specific actions like the Rwanda plan.

How: Changing Subject, Criticising Opposition

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)