Context
No specific events or incidents mentioned, but the question arises from a concern over the UK's diplomatic stance and its implications on international law.
Question
What assessment he has made of the potential effect of relocating the British embassy in Israel to Jerusalem. I am very pleased to hear that, as I know my constituents will be. However, why was that move ever under consideration, given that last month at the United Nations, 143 countries, including Israel and the UK, voted to reaffirm that any unilateral annexation of territory by another state is a violation of international law? Navi Pillay, the former UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, has observed that unless that principle is applied equally to the Occupied Palestinian Territories, including East Jerusalem, it would become meaningless. Is this not just another example of the Conservative party's chaotic approach to international relations that has so badly undermined the UK's reputation on the global stage?
Answer from David Rutley
There are no plans to move the UK embassy in Israel from Tel Aviv. The Government have looked at this issue. We will continue to work to ensure that we are in the best position possible to continue promoting peace and stability in the region and supporting a two-state solution.
Not addressed: The reasons for considering moving the embassy were not addressed, nor was there a detailed explanation of how the current stance aligns with international law.
Was this summary accurate? Tell us
How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)