Commons Sense

House of Commons · Ministers' Questions

Topical Questions

Thursday 14 July 2022 · 12 questions

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Answered 0 Partly answered 8 Not answered 0

Key points

  • Lee Anderson questioned the efficiency of civil servants and local government officers returning to work post-pandemic, emphasizing the need for them to be back in the office.
  • Angela Rayner raised concerns about national security issues and the admission by the Prime Minister of meeting a sanctioned individual.
  • Patricia Gibson expressed alarm over potential energy costs this winter leading to people spending days in public buildings due to inability to afford heating at home.

Topics (select to filter)

Questions & Answers

Context

Anderson raised concerns about the efficiency of having local government officers and civil servants back in their offices after the pandemic.

Question

Not every civil servant and local government officer is back at work after the pandemic, which is creating backlogs and is a waste of taxpayers' money, so what more can we do to ensure that every local government officer and civil servant is back in the office as soon as possible?

Answer from Kit Malthouse

My hon. Friend makes an extremely important point. He is right to say that we want to see as many people as possible back in the office, not just because it is more efficient and we think it is a better way for government to operate, but because we all, importantly, have a duty to the young. It is impossible for them to acquire the skills and abilities they need when they are working remotely.

Partly answered

Not addressed: He did not provide specific measures or timelines on getting civil servants back to work.

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email
Context

Rayner questioned the PM's meeting with a sanctioned individual shortly after a NATO summit, raising concerns about national security.

Question

I welcome the new Ministers to their places on the Treasury Bench for what could be their first and last Cabinet Office orals. It is a pleasure to be here with them. Last week, the Prime Minister finally admitted to meeting former KGB agent Alexander Lebedev, a man who was sanctioned by the Canadian Government. This was directly after a top-level NATO meeting and just weeks after a chemical attack by Russian agents on British soil. No officials or security were present. I have written to the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster but am yet to receive a reply, so I hope he will answer my questions now. Did the Prime Minister take any papers from the NATO meeting? Was his phone compromised? Why do Foreign Office records show the presence of an unidentified guest? Given his responsibilities for national security and ministerial standards, does the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster believe this was inappropriate conduct by the Prime Minister?

Answer from Kit Malthouse

I am in receipt of the right hon. Lady's letter. Obviously, a number of those questions have to be answered by No. 10. We will forward it to No. 10 and will be replying in due course.

Not addressed: Did not directly address the issue of national security or PM's conduct, deflected responsibility to another department.

How: Forwarding Questions To Another Department

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email
Q3 Angela Rayner Lab Ashton-under-Lyne
Context

Rayner questioned the delay in starting a public inquiry into the Government's handling of the pandemic and concerns about evidence being blocked.

Question

I really hope that that “due course” is very quick, because this is an issue of national security, which is obviously of concern to many of our constituents. Let me move on to another very serious issue. Yesterday, our country reached the dark milestone of 200,000 covid deaths, which is a tragedy for our country and all those who have lost loved ones. The Prime Minister delayed the start of the public inquiry into the Government's handling of the pandemic, with the hearings not expected until 2023, making a full inquiry unlikely before the next election. This week, reports suggest that the Government are trying to block evidence to the inquiry, with Ministers fearful that they could be sued for damages and officials apparently making evidence that could be withheld. There can be no hint of a cover-up or excuses for Ministers dodging scrutiny. Does the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster deny those reports that have been put in the press? If not, how can he assure us and the public that the process will be independent?

Answer from Kit Malthouse

The right hon. Lady has her very own brand of toxic, which she attempts to pump into everything that the Government do. [Interruption.] No, no, we cannot conduct debate in this House on the, “When did you stop beating your wife?” questions. This inquiry will be independently chaired and thoroughly conducted.

Not addressed: Did not address the question about evidence blocking or independence of the inquiry.

How: Personal Attack

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email
Context

Morris criticized the Government for inefficiencies in public services and proposed cuts to jobs.

Question

Clearly, this Government cannot organise the processing of passports or driving licences on time. There are repeated errors in issuing visas to the correct location. Ambulances are stacked outside A&E units. NHS dentist appointments are as rare as hen's teeth, and now the Minister wants to close the Seaham Department for Work and Pensions office in my constituency. Can the Cabinet Ministers join the dots, and recognise that cutting and undermining jobs in the public service is not the answer?

Answer from Jacob Rees-Mogg

The reason that some DWP offices will not be needed is that unemployment did not rise in the way that was anticipated. We have the lowest level of unemployment in this country since 1974, and the highest number of people in payroll work, and it is only right that the estate of DWP meets the requirements of the DWP. We get huge efficiencies by implementing technology better.

Partly answered

Not addressed: Did not address inefficiencies or job cuts directly; focused on low unemployment rates.

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email
Q5 David Simmonds Con Ruislip, Northwood and Pinner
Context

Local authorities in Ruislip, Northwood and Pinner are using efficiency programmes to mitigate council tax increases and reinvest in frontline services.

Question

The two local authorities that serve my constituents—Hillingdon and Harrow—have shared with me how they quantify the savings from efficiency programmes. Can my right hon. Friend share with me what approach central Government are taking to demonstrate how savings from efficiency are helping to keep taxes down and focus money on the frontline?

Answer from Jacob Rees-Mogg

Again, this is a very important point to raise. Central Government—the Cabinet Office's Crown Commercial Service—is saving into the billions of pounds across Government, which is money that is then available for Departments. That saves those Department's budgets and ensures more efficient procurement. We are also cracking down on fraud. I am looking forward to the launch of the public sector fraud authority, which hopes to be able to save £180 million in the first year of its operation.

Partly answered

Not addressed: The answerer did not provide specific details on how central government demonstrates efficiency savings for tax reduction and frontline service funding.

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email
Q6 Bell Ribeiro-Addy Lab Clapham and Brixton Hill
Context

The Public and Commercial Services Union has called for a public inquiry into racism and bullying in the Cabinet Office, citing numerous complaints and a significant compensation payout.

Question

This week, the PCS union called on the Government to launch a public inquiry into racism and bullying in the Cabinet Office. It has more than 80 members of staff formally complaining about racial bullying or profiling. Before the Minister refers to the review into racism, which has been branded a whitewash, I ask him what steps he is taking to facilitate the public inquiry that the PCS union has asked for?

Answer from Michael Ellis

The Cabinet Office is conducting its own review of the matter, as the hon. Lady referred to. Any incident of racism is unacceptable anywhere, and every effort will be made to alleviate and extinguish the problem to which she refers. The Cabinet Office makes every concerted effort possible, and Ministers will continue to do that to eliminate the pernicious problem to which she refers.

Partly answered

Not addressed: The answerer did not provide specific steps for facilitating a public inquiry as requested by the PCS union.

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email
Context

The cancellation of a meeting between an MP and a Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Education due to the latter becoming the Education Secretary.

Question

On average, two children in every class have a developmental language disorder. As chair of the all-party group on speech and language difficulties, I arranged a meeting with a Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Education. It was then cancelled because he was made Education Secretary. What process is in place to ensure that MPs' meetings with Ministers are sustained?

Answer from Kit Malthouse

As new Ministers take their positions over the summer, their diaries will naturally be reviewed. If the hon. Gentleman experiences significant delays in achieving the promised meeting, he should write to me.

Partly answered

Not addressed: The answerer did not provide specific details about a process for maintaining meetings with new Ministers.

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email
Q8 Debbie Abrahams Lab Oldham East and Saddleworth
NHS
Context

Concerns about potential Government procurement fraud during the PPE supply process.

Question

The VIP lane for personal protective equipment procurement was one of the early scandals of this Government. Will the procurement Bill establish a corrupt practices investigation unit to help to investigate potential frauds associated with public procurement?

Answer from Jacob Rees-Mogg

As I mentioned, the public sector fraud authority will be announced shortly, but I think this attack on PPE is simply misplaced. The fact is that everybody in the country was calling for PPE—[Interruption.] In the world, as my right hon. and learned Friend the Minister for the Cabinet Office and Paymaster General helpfully points out.

Not addressed: The answerer changed subject to defending the overall PPE procurement process rather than addressing the specific request about establishing an investigation unit.

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email
Context

Concern over the potential need for heat banks due to high energy prices, despite Scotland's rich energy resources.

Question

Money Saving Expert Martin Lewis has warned that in the UK we may reach a point this winter where people spend their days in public buildings because they cannot afford to heat their homes. Does the Secretary of State share my alarm that that could happen?

Answer from Kit Malthouse

We all share the hon. Lady's deep concern about the impact of energy prices on citizens across the UK. The Government are taking urgent steps to help alleviate those costs, including a £400 rebate on every electricity bill this autumn.

Partly answered

Not addressed: The answerer did not address the specific alarm raised by the questioner about potential severe energy price issues leading to heat banks.

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email
Q10 Ruth Jones Lab Newport West and Islwyn
Context

Outrage over nearly £17,000 in severance pay being given to resigning ministers.

Question

The news that Ministers who resigned last week will receive nearly £17,000 in severance pay has outraged the people of Newport West. I have a long list of things we could do with that money in Newport West. Will the Minister make time to meet me next week to discuss it?

Answer from Heather Wheeler

I am afraid the hon. Lady should have listened to the answers given at the urgent question the other day—[Interruption.] That is absolutely fine, thank you very much. She can read Hansard; we went into great detail.

Not addressed: The answerer redirected to previous discussions rather than scheduling a meeting or addressing the specific request.

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email
Q11 Diana R. Johnson Lab Kingston upon Hull North and Cottingham
NHS
Context

The infected blood scandal has led to the deaths of 419 people since the inquiry announcement, pressing the need for interim payments.

Question

After decades of cover-up and the appalling treatment of those who were infected by receiving contaminated blood, will the Minister now say that interim payments will be made to those people as recommended by Sir Robert Francis in his review where he said there was a 'compelling case' for them to be paid?

Answer from Michael Ellis

The Government are considering the recommendations made by Sir Robert Francis QC in his study of a framework for compensation for victims and will respond just as soon as possible.

Partly answered

Not addressed: Did not confirm interim payments despite 'compelling case'

How: Under Review, Expeditious Consideration

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email
Context

The previous Minister for Defence People declined to uphold the decision of this House to hold an inquiry, prompting a push for further clarification on improvements.

Question

Can I press this Minister further to expand a little more on what he suggested to the hon. Member for Bracknell earlier regarding expanding services and inquiries for veterans?

Answer from Johnny Mercer

My line on Veterans UK has always been the same: it needs to improve its output, and I will be working closely with my colleagues and others to ensure that veterans receive a better service from Veterans UK.

Partly answered

Not addressed: Did not provide specific details on measures or timeline for improvements

How: Needs To Improve, Working Closely

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email