Commons Sense

House of Commons · Ministers' Questions

Conversion Therapy Ban: Faith-based Settings

Wednesday 24 November 2021 · 1 question

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Key points

  • Kate Osborne asked about the findings of the national LGBT survey regarding conversion therapy in religious settings.
  • The Minister stated that it is important to ensure people are not coerced into conversion therapy.
  • The Minister also mentioned protecting freedom of speech and the ability of adults to consent in religious contexts.

Topics (select to filter)

Questions & Answers

Q1 Kate Osborne Lab Jarrow and Gateshead East
Context

The national LGBT survey found that 51% of conversion therapy happens in religious settings, with victims often undertaking these practices voluntarily. Government-commissioned research has highlighted the risks of allowing consent as a defence for such practices.

Question

The national LGBT survey found that 51% of conversion therapy happens in religious settings and Government-commissioned research found that adult victims often undertake religious conversion practices voluntarily, so the Government's proposal to allow informed consent for conversion therapy will permit that abuse to continue and risks introducing consent defences to other forms of abuse, such as domestic violence. Can the Secretary of State confirm whether a conversion therapy ban will cover non-physical conversion practices in religious settings, including prayer? Will she remove the dangerous consent loophole?

Answer from Elizabeth Truss

What is important is that we ensure that people are not coerced into conversion therapy, but it is also important to protect freedom of speech, the ability of adults to consent and the freedom to express the teachings of—[Interruption.] I hear Opposition Members asking whether freedom of speech is a good thing. Yes, it is.

Not addressed: The Secretary did not confirm or deny whether non-physical conversion practices would be banned or if the consent loophole would be removed.

How: Discussed Freedom Of Speech Instead

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)