Context
The MP's constituent, Chris, has had part of his skull removed following a stroke. He is prone to falling but has been refused necessary surgery by his surgeon.
Question
A young constituent of mine, Chris, has had to have part of his skull removed following a stroke. Although he is prone to falling, his brain has been largely unprotected for nearly two years. This is because his surgeon feels that the necessary surgery is primarily cosmetic. Several other of my constituents have been refused surgery on those grounds, despite procedures being available elsewhere. What steps is my right hon. Friend taking to level up such health disparities and make health inequality a thing of the past?
Answer from Sajid Javid
First, I am sorry to hear about my hon. Friend's constituent Chris and wish him all the very best. She will know that clinical commissioning groups are responsible for commissioning local healthcare services. If the aim of a cosmetic procedure is health rated, such as the need to repair or reconstruct missing or damaged tissue or skin that might come through illness, birth defect or accident, it will be commissioned and seen to by commissioners. She refers to a particular case. If she would like to provide me with more details, I would be happy to take a look.
Not addressed: The issue of health disparities was not directly addressed; instead, the Secretary referred the constituent to clinical commissioning groups and asked for more details about Chris's case.
How: Asked For More Details
Was this summary accurate? Tell us
How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)