Judicial Review and Courts Bill
2021-11-09
TAGS
Response quality
Questions & Answers
Q1
Direct Answer
▸
Context
The Judicial Review and Courts Bill has been discussed in the House of Commons. The bill aims to fix inefficient processes causing delays in the justice system.
What recent discussions he has had with Cabinet colleagues on the Judicial Review and Courts Bill?
The Bill had its Second Reading in this House on 26 October. It is now in Committee, where the hon. Lady is part of that Committee. The Bill fixes inefficient processes causing delay and gives judges more flexibility to resolve judicial reviews practically.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Response accuracy
Q2
Partial Answer
▸
Context
The minister recently made comments about UK Parliament potentially correcting decisions of the judiciary that ministers disagree with, raising concerns for judicial independence.
Given recent chilling comments from the Minister on the UK Parliament's role in correcting judicial decisions Ministers disagree with, can he acknowledge the concerns this raises regarding separation of powers and how it affects the UK's credibility among European countries who threaten judicial independence?
The Bill strengthens judicial review by introducing new remedies like suspending quashing orders, which the hon. Lady mentioned as beneficial for constituents and public administration.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Concerns about the separation of powers were not directly addressed, only countered with benefits.
Counterargument
Response accuracy
Q3
Direct Answer
▸
Context
The Bill includes a chapter on coroners but does not address the issue of legal aid for bereaved families when state institutions are represented.
Given that the Bill contains a whole chapter on coroners yet entirely neglects giving bereaved families fair hearing at inquests, especially regarding their right to legal aid without means testing when many state bodies are represented free-of-cost, can he now commit to non-means-tested funding for such families and table amendments accordingly?
We are drafting measures to remove means test on exceptional case funding, which should be implemented early next year.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Response accuracy
Q4
Partial Answer
▸
Context
There is concern about the removal of Cart and Eba-type judicial reviews, which are vital for ordinary people.
Why does the Government propose to remove a crucial last line of defence for ordinary citizens by eliminating Cart and Eba-type judicial reviews used predominantly by vulnerable individuals?
We have debated this extensively in Committee. The Bill is fair as cases receive three bites at the cherry, whereas others get only two. However, we must manage resources efficiently; dealing with serious backlogs takes priority.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Specific concerns about fairness were not fully addressed, focusing on resource management instead.
Resource Prioritization
Response accuracy
Q5
Partial Answer
▸
Context
There is worry that the presumption in favour of prospective quashing orders will prevent ordinary people from obtaining redress or compensation, even if courts declare actions unlawful.
How does this Government's proposed presumption clause allowing for prospective quashing orders, ensuring no redress or compensation and time to change laws, align with natural justice principles for the average person compared to those with wealth and power?
The presumption clause is there simply to expedite jurisprudence accumulation, not as hon. Lady suggested for weakening natural justice for ordinary citizens.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Concerns about natural justice were addressed but with a counter argument rather than a direct answer.
Counterargument
Response accuracy