Context
The question arises from a case where HMRC's advice led to higher settlements for individuals who resolved their issues before the Morse review recommendations were implemented.
Question
My constituent Peter Phillips fell victim to the loan charge in 2019 and settled before 30 September 2020. HMRC advised him, like many others, that that was the right thing to do. In effect, those who settled before the Morse review did not get the benefit of the changes that were implemented: my constituent paid more than someone who disclosed nothing to HMRC. Does my right hon. Friend think that was in the spirit of the Morse review? Has HMRC got it wrong?
Answer from Rishi Sunak (Chancellor of the Exchequer)
It is obviously difficult for me to comment on the case of a particular individual. The previous Chancellor, my right hon. Friend the Member for Bromsgrove (Sajid Javid), asked Lord Morse to conduct an independent review and the Government accepted and implemented the vast majority of its recommendations. People who settled early had the benefit of certainty from their settlement, but my hon. Friend should write to the Financial Secretary to the Treasury and we will ensure that we look at that case, as he requests.
Not addressed: Did not directly address if HMRC's advice was contrary to the Morse Review or acknowledge it being wrong.
Was this summary accurate? Tell us
How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)