Commons Sense

House of Commons · Ministers' Questions

Topical Questions

Tuesday 7 September 2021 · 18 questions

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Answered 2 Partly answered 10 Not answered 0

Key points

  • Government launched a plan for jobs over a year ago to help people back into work and gain skills for future jobs.
  • The Chancellor highlighted that the UK is forecast to grow faster this year than any other country in the G7.
  • The Chancellor assured that discussions on long-term funding for maintained nursery schools will be part of the spending review.

Topics (select to filter)

Questions & Answers

Q1 Stephen Timms Lab East Ham
Context

The question follows an initial query about the department's responsibilities.

Question

If he will make a statement on his departmental responsibilities. Over a year ago, the Government launched their plan for jobs, a comprehensive and ambitious plan to help people back into work to earn more and to gain the skills they need to succeed in the jobs of tomorrow. The latest data shows that our GDP and our economy is recovering quickly, unemployment is falling, jobs are being created, and, indeed, household incomes have been protected.

Answer from Rishi Sunak

Over a year ago, the Government launched their plan for jobs, a comprehensive and ambitious plan to help people back into work to earn more and to gain the skills they need to succeed in the jobs of tomorrow. The latest data shows that our GDP and our economy is recovering quickly, unemployment is falling, jobs are being created, and, indeed, household incomes have been protected.

Not addressed: Specific departmental responsibilities were not detailed

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Context

The MP notes the cutting of universal credit by £20 a week will have significant negative impacts on working families, undermining the recovery and levelling up efforts.

Question

Cutting universal credit by £20 a week will hit working families very hard. It will leave support for unemployed families at the lowest real terms level for over 30 years. It will undermine the recovery and scupper the prospects for levelling up. Does the Chancellor of the Exchequer understand why every single former Work and Pensions Secretary since 2010 has opposed his cut?

Answer from Rishi Sunak

The right hon. Gentleman talks about economic recovery. We are forecast to grow faster this year than any other country in the G7. The recovery is under way. Jobs are being created, people are getting into work, wages are rising.

Not addressed: The specific ask about understanding past opposition was not addressed

How: Discussed Economic Growth Instead

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Context

The MP calls for an urgent long-term funding settlement for maintained nursery schools.

Question

Will the Chancellor provide an update on the follow-up to the discussions we have had on maintained nursery schools, and will he urgently bring forward a long-term funding settlement for these brilliant schools?

Answer from Rishi Sunak

My right hon. Friend is right to highlight this issue, which I know is of particular importance to her and her constituency. I assure her that I have spoken to my team about it and, as part of the spending review, we will further those discussions with the Department for Education.

Partly answered

Not addressed: No long-term funding settlement was committed

How: Will Discuss With Department

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Q4 Rachel Reeves Lab Leeds West and Pudsey
Context

The MP expresses concern that increasing national insurance will hit workers hard, undermining economic recovery.

Question

The Prime Minister's and the Chancellor's plans to increase national insurance will hit workers and businesses hard at the worst possible time. The British Chambers of Commerce described it as a “drag anchor” on jobs growth. The Federation of Small Businesses stated: “If this hike happens, fewer jobs will be created”. The TUC said that it is wrong to hit young and low-paid workers while “leaving the wealthy untouched”. We agree. Will the Chancellor of the Exchequer therefore explain why he is choosing a tax on jobs rather than on other forms of income?

Answer from Rishi Sunak

I am very pleased to see the Labour party finally focus on the importance of jobs in this House. We also agree that it is important to support companies to hire people, which is why there is no national insurance payable on those employing people under the age of 21, on most apprentices up to the age of 25 or on people who are going to be employed in new freeports.

Partly answered

Not addressed: No explanation was provided for choosing a tax on jobs

How: Discussed Support For Hiring

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Q5 Rachel Reeves Lab Leeds West and Pudsey
Context

The MP criticises the Chancellor's promise to cut national insurance as broken, noting its negative impacts.

Question

You cannot have it both ways. Cutting national insurance either benefits jobs or it does not. The Chancellor told voters at the election: “Our plans are to cut taxes for the lowest paid through cutting national insurance”. That promise is now in flames. The Chancellor is not cutting national insurance; he is putting it up. It cannot be right that nurses and builders are set to pay hundreds of pounds more each year in national insurance, yet those getting their incomes from a large portfolio of shares, stocks and property will pay not a penny more. Labour cannot and will not support this Tory Government's manifesto-breaking, economically damaging and unfair tax on jobs. So let me ask the Chancellor again: why will this Government not fund health and social care in a way that is fair for families and for businesses?

Answer from Rishi Sunak

I will be brief, Mr Speaker. When the hon. Lady was appointed shadow Chancellor, she went out of her way to say that any policies that the Labour party put forward on her watch would be “fully costed and we will explain how they are paid for”. We have heard about uplifts to welfare.

Not addressed: The specific ask was not addressed; instead, criticism of opposition was made

How: Criticised Labour'S Policies

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Q6 Luke Evans Con Hinckley and Bosworth
Context

The MP proposes a national centre of conservation and education at Twycross Zoo, supported by various local bodies.

Question

The levelling-up fund is about improving a region. In Bosworth, we are putting forward the Twycross zoo for its national centre of conservation and education. It will be a world-leading scientific, education and conservation centre, driving tourism and the local economy. It is backed by the borough council, the county council, the local enterprise partnership and the midlands engine. Would the Chancellor like to come and visit it and, failing that, would he like to meet me to discuss how we can make this a symbol of the levelling up of the nation?

Answer from Steve Barclay

I do not know about the Chancellor, but I am sure my children would love to come and visit the zoo. I thank my hon. Friend for putting forward a bid for the levelling-up fund. As he will know, bids are currently subject to competitive assessment against objective criteria.

Not addressed: The specific ask was not addressed; instead, an invitation was acknowledged indirectly

How: Acknowledged Zoo Visit

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Context

The MP inquires about ensuring that the benefits of North Sea offshore wind development reach East Lothian.

Question

Scottish communities, other than those in Shetland, failed to benefit from the North sea oil and gas bounty landing on their shores. Now that the North sea's offshore wind is casting ashore on East Lothian, will the Treasury ensure that East Lothian will actually benefit, as opposed to it all simply being transmission-stationed down south? Or will it go the same way as Scotland's oil and gas: down to the Treasury?

Answer from Kemi Badenoch

We support the UK oil and gas sector, especially as gas is a transition fuel to net zero. The sector supports 147,000 jobs directly in its supply chains. I take the point that the hon. Gentleman raises; if he would like to write to me with more detail, I think I will be able to give him more comprehensive answers.

Partly answered

Not addressed: No commitment was made for East Lothian benefits

How: Invited Follow-Up Letter

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Context

Discussion on job creation, investment, and workforce upskilling.

Question

I commend my right hon. Friend the Chancellor for all his determination to create new jobs and new investment and to upskill the workforce; I believe it is paying dividends, as we are seeing in the economy. Does he agree that further education colleges have a vital role in upskilling our workforce, both young and not so young, to get the best jobs for the future?

Answer from Rishi Sunak

My right hon. Friend is absolutely right about the important role of FE colleges, which is why I was pleased in the last Budget to invest billions over this Parliament to improve the infrastructure and the quality of our FE estate. With the Prime Minister's lifetime skills guarantee, FE colleges will be instrumental in delivering to all adults the extra qualification that they need to get better-paid jobs.

Answered
Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Q9 Tan Dhesi Lab Slough
Context

Concerns over the lack of investment in UK's strategic steel sector for national infrastructure projects.

Question

The Government should lead by example with their spending power and with the design of public contracts to buy more from Great Britain, as Labour would, but the UK strategic steel sector has been neglected by this Conservative Government. Highly skilled jobs have been lost because a huge proportion of our steel, including for HS2, is purchased from other nations. Will the Chancellor explain why his Government do not even have a non-binding target for the use of our own steel in our national public infrastructure projects?

Answer from Steve Barclay

The hon. Gentleman raises a very valid point. It is right that we maximise the opportunities from domestic suppliers; my right hon. Friend the Business Secretary is focusing on that through the industrial strategy. It is also linked to targeting the seven innovation sectors funded through the significant uplift in our research and development budget.

Partly answered

Not addressed: Did not address why there is no non-binding target for UK steel use in public infrastructure projects

How: Under Review, Industrial Strategy Focus

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Context

Concerns over a funding shortage for modernising A&E services in Shropshire.

Question

We are working hard in Shropshire on a £500 million investment in modernising A&E services in our local hospital. There is a funding shortage; I have written to the Chancellor on the issue and would be very grateful for a response. There is nothing more important than modernising A&E services for the safety of our patients and constituents.

Answer from Steve Barclay

I know that that is a very important constituency issue, and my hon. Friend has championed it frequently. He will know that, through the long-term plan, there is a £33.9 billion uplift in core funding, in addition to the other funding through covid and other measures announced by my right hon. Friend the Chancellor. I am very happy to discuss the matter with my hon. Friend; he is right to focus on it.

Partly answered

Not addressed: Did not address the specific £500 million investment request or funding shortage issue

How: Long-Term Plan Uplift, Constituency Champion

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Q11 Kate Osborne Lab Jarrow and Gateshead East
Context

Research revealing regression in disabled children's condition management during the pandemic.

Question

Research by the Disabled Children's Partnership has revealed that nearly three quarters of disabled children have regressed in managing their conditions during the pandemic as vital services have been delayed. Ahead of the forthcoming spending review, will the Chancellor consider offering a lifeline to families and funding dedicated recovery to help disabled children and their families to catch up on missed services?

Answer from Rishi Sunak

I thank the hon. Lady for raising that important point. I would be very happy to make sure that it is considered as part of the spending review.

Partly answered

Not addressed: Did not commit to specific funding or recovery services

How: Will Be Considered

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Q12 Martin Vickers Con Brigg and Immingham
Context

Proposed east-west freight corridor linking Humber ports to the west coast.

Question

The Chancellor referred earlier to the record amounts being invested in the rail network. May I urge him to ensure that one of the projects that he supports is an east-west freight corridor linking the Humber ports to the west coast? That would greatly maximise the benefits of freeport status; it would also aid the levelling-up agenda.

Answer from Steve Barclay

I am in no doubt about the importance and the merits of my hon. Friend's approach to freeports, not least after an early morning meeting that he and I had—last week, I think—on that very topic. As part of the integrated rail plan, we are looking at how we link that to levelling up across the UK.

Partly answered

Not addressed: Did not confirm support for the east-west freight corridor project

How: Integrated Rail Plan, Meeting Discussed

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Q13 Peter Kyle Lab Hove and Portslade
Context

Tax break given to businesses compared with lack of funding for education recovery.

Question

At the last Budget, the Chancellor gave a £25 billion tax break to the top 1% of businesses in the form of the super deduction, but when the school catch-up tsar came to him asking for £15 billion over a three-year period, he said that he could not fund<br/>“everybody who comes knocking on my door.” Why is it that when an Amazon-style business comes knocking, the door is wide open, but when students come knocking, asking for money to get over the challenges of the past few years, the door is slammed in their face?

Answer from Rishi Sunak

That is absolutely not right. When it comes to the super deduction, what the Labour party will never understand is that we want to support businesses to create jobs. That is what the super deduction does. I just gave the hon. Gentleman the example of BT creating thousands of new jobs because of the super deduction.

Partly answered

Not addressed: Did not address why schools did not receive additional funding

How: Support Businesses, Jobs Creation

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Context

Discussion on the restart scheme aimed at those unemployed for over a year.

Question

Jobs are the most important way of helping communities to move forward. Those who have been out of work for 12 months or more can access the restart scheme, worth nearly £3 billion. Will my right hon. Friend ensure that part of his plan is helping everyone to have proper, decent work and decent training to enable them to get the right job?

Answer from Steve Barclay

My hon. Friend is absolutely right to highlight not only the importance of restart to the long-term unemployed, but how it sits alongside the kickstart scheme, the tripling of traineeships and the boot camps for skills. That is part of a plan for jobs that is working.

Partly answered

Not addressed: Did not commit to helping everyone through proper training and jobs

How: Plan For Jobs, Various Schemes

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Context

Chancellor's approval of £200 million for the Prime Minister's yacht while planning to cut universal credit.

Question

Will the Chancellor clarify which Department is paying the £200 million for the Prime Minister's vanity yacht? What does it say about this Conservative Government's warped priorities when the Chancellor approves that while planning to cut universal credit for those who need it the most?

Answer from Rishi Sunak

This Government are proud of the record investment that we have made in our armed forces—a record settlement for the next few years to support our forces and the work that they do around the world to ensure that we can play our responsible role.

Not addressed: Did not address yacht funding or universal credit cuts

How: Record Armed Forces Investment

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Q16 Jeremy Hunt Con Godalming and Ash
NHS
Context

The Health and Social Care Committee heard that additional doctors are needed to address the NHS backlog. The question is prompted by discussions on how to reform the system alongside financial investments.

Question

I am concerned about the need for 4,000 more doctors to tackle the backlog in the NHS. Does he agree that this is about reform as well as money, particularly in respect of the way we plan our workforce?

Answer from Rishi Sunak

My right hon. Friend speaks on these matters with extreme authority and experience, and I thank him for all his engagement on them with me and others. He will know that we are committed to delivering 50,000 more nurses and 50 million more primary care appointments, but as part of that plan we must ensure that we get the number of GPs right as well.

Partly answered

Not addressed: The specific ask about reforming workforce planning was not addressed

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Context

The Prime Minister and the Chancellor have broken previous manifesto promises on overseas aid, tax lock, and pensions triple lock. This has raised questions about the reliability of future Tory pledges.

Question

Given that the Prime Minister and the Chancellor have already decided to break their manifesto commitment on overseas aid and are now gearing up to break their solemn manifesto promises on the tax lock and the pensions triple lock, why should any voter believe ever again that a Tory manifesto promise is worth the paper it is written on?

Answer from Rishi Sunak

What people know they get from this Conservative Government is a Government who are on their side, a Government who are delivering their priorities, whether their priority is 50,000 more nurses, 20,000 more police officers, record investment in every part of our country, or having a Government who are creating jobs and prosperity wherever people live.

Not addressed: The question about manifesto reliability was avoided

How: Changed Subject To Positive Achievements

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Context

There is a focus on the levelling-up agenda, especially initiatives in the north of England. The question arises from discussions about new projects that could aid employment.

Question

I know that this Government are listening to the levelling-up agenda, especially in the north of England, and on that note I should like to suggest that the best way of getting people back into work is putting forward new initiatives. Will the Chancellor meet me shortly to talk about Eden Project North?

Answer from Rishi Sunak

I should be very happy to.

Answered
Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)