Context
The question arises from concerns about the impact on individuals who have been sexually assaulted when their names are publicly disclosed.
Question
What steps he is taking to tackle public naming of victims of sexual assault. The public naming of a rape victim who has bravely come forward is devastating for the individual concerned, but under current legislation perpetrators of this crime get no more than a mere £200 fine. At a time when 44% of rape victims are actually pulling out of the justice system before their day in court, does the Minister agree that such lax laws can deter even more sexual assault victims from coming forward? If so, why did his Government vote down proposals that would have strengthened prosecuting powers against such perpetrators?
Answer from Kit Malthouse
It is an offence to publish any matter likely to identify a person who has made an allegation of rape or other sexual assault. The prohibition applies automatically from the moment the offence is reported and has effect throughout the complainant's lifetime. Those proposals were not appropriate for support, but we are having a think and will make an announcement shortly.
Not addressed: The answerer did not provide specific information about steps being taken to prevent public naming or address the adequacy of current laws and fines.
Was this summary accurate? Tell us
How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)