Commons Sense

House of Commons · Ministers' Questions

EU Citizens: Settled Status

Monday 7 June 2021 · 2 questions

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Answered 0 Partly answered 2 Not answered 0

Key points

  • Sarah Olney asked the Minister about steps to ensure EU citizens with indefinite leave to remain do not need to apply for EU settled status.
  • The Minister responded that those with ILR who are eligible for EUSS can retain ILR without applying for EUSS.
  • Letters were sent to potential EUSS applicants, clarifying that ILR holders need not switch to EU settled status.

Topics (select to filter)

Questions & Answers

Q1 Sarah Olney Lib Dem Richmond Park
Context

Concern about EU citizens with indefinite leave to remain receiving letters suggesting they should apply for EU settled status, leading to confusion and fear regarding their future status.

Question

What steps she is taking to ensure that EU citizens with indefinite leave to remain will not be required to apply for EU settled status. I am grateful to the Minister for his answer, and I would like to offer my condolences to the Under-Secretary of State for the Home Department, the hon. Member for Torbay (Kevin Foster). Many constituents of mine who have previously been granted indefinite leave to remain have received letters suggesting that they should apply for EU settled status instead. This has created a great deal of consternation and a fear that their indefinite leave to remain status may not be valid in the future. Can the Minister tell me why those letters were sent? It is not clear to people whether or not they should be applying for EU settled status.

Answer from Chris Philp

My understanding is that those people with ILR who are also eligible for EUSS can continue to enjoy ILR whether or not they apply for EUSS. Letters were sent out to people who might be eligible for EUSS, but I believe those letters did make it clear that someone who received those letters who was already naturalised as a British citizen or indeed had ILR needed to take no further action. If the hon. Lady thinks those letters were unclear, I will be happy to look into it further, but I understand that they were worded in such way as made it clear that no further action was taken in the circumstances she describes.

Partly answered

Not addressed: Did not provide a clear directive or commitment to clarify and reword letters for constituents who are already eligible under ILR but received conflicting advice.

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email
Q2 Sarah Olney Lib Dem Richmond Park
Context

Concern about EU citizens with indefinite leave to remain receiving letters suggesting they should apply for EU settled status, leading to confusion and a fear that their ILR status may not be valid in the future.

Question

Many constituents of mine who have previously been granted indefinite leave to remain have received letters suggesting that they should apply for EU settled status instead. This has created a great deal of consternation and a fear that their indefinite leave to remain status may not be valid in the future. Can the Minister tell me why those letters were sent? It is not clear to people whether or not they should be applying for EU settled status.

Answer from Chris Philp

My understanding is that those people with ILR who are also eligible for EUSS can continue to enjoy ILR whether or not they apply for EUSS. Letters were sent out to people who might be eligible for EUSS, but I believe those letters did make it clear that someone who received those letters who was already naturalised as a British citizen or indeed had ILR needed to take no further action. If the hon. Lady thinks those letters were unclear, I will be happy to look into it further, but I understand that they were worded in such way as made it clear that no further action was taken in the circumstances she describes.

Partly answered

Not addressed: Did not provide a clear directive or commitment to clarify and reword letters for constituents who are already eligible under ILR but received conflicting advice.

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email