Context
In the wake of the Grenfell Tower disaster, hundreds of thousands of families still live in unsafe homes due to cladding issues, with some facing large debts.
Question
I strongly associate myself with the earlier part of the Prime Minister's comments. May I raise something slightly different though? It is nearly four years since the Grenfell Tower tragedy claimed some 72 lives, yet hundreds of thousands of families still live in unsafe, unsellable homes, and many leaseholders face crippling debts, through no fault of their own—Trident Point, Pearmain House and Amber Court are all in my constituency. Given that this was the biggest building scandal in modern UK history, why did the Prime Minister order his MPs to vote down our efforts yesterday to get this scandal sorted once and for all?
Answer from Boris Johnson
I in no way underestimate the suffering of the victims of Grenfell or of those whose buildings—whose homes—have been prejudiced by the spectre of unsafe materials. That is why we have provided an unprecedented £5 billion of investment, and I can also tell the hon. Gentleman that the most dangerous cladding is already gone or is going from all high-rise buildings. We certainly agree that leaseholders should be protected from remediation costs, and people in high-rise buildings will pay nothing to replace their unsafe cladding.
Not addressed: The Prime Minister did not address why his MPs voted down efforts aimed at resolving Grenfell Tower issues immediately.
How: Provided Funding Without Directly Addressing The Rejection Of Specific Efforts
Was this summary accurate? Tell us
How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)