Commons Sense

House of Commons · Ministers' Questions

Houses in Multiple Occupation

Monday 19 April 2021 · 2 questions

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Answered 0 Partly answered 2 Not answered 0

Key points

  • Ministerial questions focused on the impact of homes of multiple occupancy on local communities.
  • The Minister expressed sympathy for constituents affected by antisocial behavior linked to HMOs.
  • Local authorities have been granted strong powers to regulate and manage existing HMOs.

Topics (select to filter)

Questions & Answers

Context

The MP addresses the issue of HMOs and their impact on close-knit communities. He refers to specific towns, Rossington and Conisbrough, where an increase in HMOs has reportedly led to antisocial behaviour and a decline in community spirit.

Question

What assessment his Department has made of the effect of homes of multiple occupants on close-knit communities? I am sure my hon. Friend would agree that while most residents in HMOs are law-abiding individuals, there is no escaping the fact that very often the residents in such premises lead extremely different lifestyles from those of their neighbours. This has been a particular issue in the towns of Rossington and Conisbrough where residents have complained that the increase in the number of HMOs has caused a spike in antisocial behaviour and a loss of community spirit.

Answer from Eddie Hughes (Walsall South) (Con)

I feel a huge degree of sympathy with the constituents of Rossington and Conisbrough who may have suffered antisocial behaviour as a result of HMOs in their area. We have given local authorities robust powers to regulate the standards and management of existing HMOs, including HMO licensing, penalties of up to £30,000 for breaches of the law and, for the worst offenders, banning orders.

Partly answered

Not addressed: The specific location of residents in more appropriate areas was not addressed

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email
Context

The MP addresses the issue of HMOs and their impact on close-knit communities. He refers to specific towns, Rossington and Conisbrough, where an increase in HMOs has reportedly led to antisocial behaviour and a decline in community spirit.

Question

What assessment his Department has made of the effect of homes of multiple occupants on close-knit communities? I am sure my hon. Friend would agree that while most residents in HMOs are law-abiding individuals, there is no escaping the fact that very often the residents in such premises lead extremely different lifestyles from those of their neighbours. This has been a particular issue in the towns of Rossington and Conisbrough where residents have complained that the increase in the number of HMOs has caused a spike in antisocial behaviour and a loss of community spirit.

Answer from Eddie Hughes (Walsall South) (Con)

I feel a huge degree of sympathy with the constituents of Rossington and Conisbrough who may have suffered antisocial behaviour as a result of HMOs in their area. We have given local authorities robust powers to regulate the standards and management of existing HMOs, including HMO licensing, penalties of up to £30,000 for breaches of the law and, for the worst offenders, banning orders.

Partly answered

Not addressed: The specific location of residents in more appropriate areas was not addressed

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email