Commons Sense

House of Commons · Ministers' Questions

Border Force Dispute: Heathrow

Monday 22 March 2021 · 1 question

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Answered 0 Partly answered 1 Not answered 0

Key points

  • Ministerial measures were introduced temporarily at Heathrow airport to protect Border Force workers' health.
  • The measures are in place for a few months and will cease in July.
  • Over 90% of affected Border Force staff now agree with the measures.

Topics (select to filter)

Questions & Answers

Q1 Ian Lavery Lab Blyth and Ashington
Context

The Border Force staff have been on the frontline during the pandemic, playing a crucial role in keeping the country covid-secure. A new roster imposed at Heathrow is causing chaos, with 96% of the affected staff balloting to strike next week.

Question

I am not surprised that the Minister is astonished, but as we all remember, Border Force staff have been on the frontline during the pandemic, and have played a pivotal role in keeping the country covid-secure. The imposition of a new roster at Heathrow airport is creating chaos. It is making staff feel less safe, as there are unavoidable covid-19 breaches; and as the Minister mentioned, there has been a 96% positive ballot result. The staff are set to walk out next week, at a time when the airport's own workers are striking over the shameful fire and rehire abuses. Will the Home Secretary intervene to pause these counterproductive changes and allow proper negotiations to take place with the PCS union before Heathrow airport grinds to a halt over the Easter holidays?

Answer from Chris Philp

These measures have been introduced on a temporary basis, for just a few months, to protect the health of the Border Force workers, and it is frankly astonishing that the union has decided to go on strike. These measures will cease to apply in July and over 90% of the affected Border Force staff now have rosters that they agree with, so I call on the PCS union to withdraw any proposal to indulge in this completely unnecessary, counterproductive strike against—absurdly—measures that are designed to protect its own members.

Partly answered

Not addressed: The Home Secretary did not directly address the specific request to pause changes and facilitate negotiations with the PCS union.

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)