Commons Sense

House of Commons · Ministers' Questions

Liverpool City Region Freeport

Wednesday 17 March 2021 · 3 questions

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Answered 0 Partly answered 2 Not answered 0

Key points

  • Ministerial discussions have occurred with Cabinet colleagues and Welsh Government Ministers regarding the Liverpool city region freeport.
  • Liverpool freeport is expected to bring significant economic benefits to the entire region including north Wales.
  • The Welsh Government's hesitation is noted as potentially hindering the freeport's full economic impact on north Wales.

Topics (select to filter)

Questions & Answers

Context

North Wales and the Liverpool city region are economically interdependent, with potential synergy between Deeside enterprise zone and proposed freeport.

Question

What discussions he has had with (a) Cabinet colleagues and (b) Ministers of the Welsh Government on maximising the potential economic benefit to north Wales of the proposed Liverpool city region freeport?

Answer from Simon Hart

I have regular discussions with Cabinet colleagues and Welsh Government Ministers about freeports. North Wales and the Liverpool city region are interdependent, and Liverpool freeport can bring significant economic benefits for the whole region.

Partly answered

Not addressed: Details on specific discussions and commitments to maximize economic benefit for north Wales were not provided.

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Context

Liverpool freeport has potential synergy with the Deeside enterprise zone, which could produce up to 15,000 jobs.

Question

As my right hon. Friend has said, Liverpool freeport is potentially of huge benefit not only to the city itself, but to north Wales, which is part of the same economic region. Does he agree that there is considerable potential synergy to be found, for example, between the Deeside enterprise zone and the new freeport, and will he urge the Welsh Government to grasp the opportunity and work with Westminster to maximise that synergy?

Answer from Simon Hart

I absolutely agree with my right hon. Friend's assessment of the situation. Local authorities and port authorities are keen on this initiative, and these schemes can produce up to 15,000 jobs each. It is therefore disappointing that the Welsh Government seem to be still dragging their feet and allowing the initiative to flourish everywhere other than Wales, which is costing jobs and livelihoods.

Partly answered

Not addressed: Specific actions or commitments from Welsh Government were not addressed.

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Context

Liverpool freeport is expected to receive £26 million investment compared to only £8 million for a UK freeport in Wales.

Question

A freeport at Liverpool will sap and displace trade, investment and jobs from Holyhead in north Wales. Liverpool will get £26 million of investment, whereas we are only being offered £8 million for one UK freeport in either north or south Wales. How will the Secretary of State ensure that Wales gets its fair share of £26 million for its one UK freeport, and how will he prevent jobs being lost and moving from north Wales to Liverpool?

Answer from Simon Hart

The best way of avoiding that outcome is for the Welsh Government to get behind the scheme and support a project that is endorsed by local authorities and port authorities in Wales, and to encourage jobs and livelihoods in that way. Every single day that they leave it—on the basis of the “not invented here” syndrome—will cost jobs and livelihoods. My message to the hon. Gentleman is get hold of the Welsh Government and encourage them to come to the party.

Not addressed: Specific measures or commitments to ensure fair investment for Wales were not provided.

How: Get Hold Of The Welsh Government And Encourage Them To Come To The Party

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)