Commons Sense

House of Commons · Ministers' Questions

PIP Application Process: Disabled People

Monday 8 March 2021 · 3 questions

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Answered 1 Partly answered 2 Not answered 0

Key points

  • The Minister responded that improvements to the personal independence payment application process have been made following research and reviews.
  • The Minister expressed willingness to meet PIP claimants in Lancaster and Wyre to listen to their experiences.
  • The Minister stated that the Department has set up a serious case panel to review themes and implement necessary measures when tackling serious issues.

Topics (select to filter)

Questions & Answers

Q1 Cat Smith Lab Lancaster and Wyre
Context

The MP inquired about the recent assessment of disabled people's experience with the Personal Independence Payment (PIP) application process.

Question

What recent assessment has been made of disabled people's experience of the personal independence payment application process?

Answer from Justin Tomlinson

We have made a series of improvements to the personal independence payment claimant experience following research and two independent reviews. Building on that, the forthcoming Green Paper on health and disability support is being influenced by the views of disabled people and representatives from disability organisations.

Partly answered

Not addressed: Did not provide specific details or timelines for improvements made to PIP claimant experience.

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email
Q2 Cat Smith Lab Lancaster and Wyre
Context

The MP requested a meeting to discuss the experiences of Personal Independence Payment (PIP) claimants in her constituency.

Question

I wrote to the Minister last week telling him about the work of the Morecambe Bay Poverty Truth Commission, which has empowered people who have experienced the social security system to speak truth to power and try to improve the system. Will he meet the PIP claimants in my constituency who want to tell him about their experiences?

Answer from Justin Tomlinson

I thank the hon. Member for that question, and I would be delighted to do that. I know that she has been very proactive on a number of issues in my area over the years, and I would be delighted to have a meeting with her and her organisation to listen to their experiences.

Answered
Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email
Context

The MP questioned the Government's response to a coroner's report that criticised failings by the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) and Capita in the death of Philippa Day due to an overdose.

Question

Following the coroner's damning prevention of future deaths report in the case of Philippa Day, who took an overdose and, sadly, passed away because of DWP and Capita failings, have the Government implemented the recommendations, and if not, when will they? As well as responding to the coroner, will the Minister keep this House updated, and do the Government not accept that, when so many people have to go through an inhumane assessment process, the system is flawed and it is time for a radical change?

Answer from Justin Tomlinson

While I cannot comment on individual cases, when we tackle any of these serious issues, we put a great amount of thought and care into doing so. That is why the Department set up the serious case panel, personally led by the Secretary of State, to look at the themes and to make sure, if there are any lessons that need to be learned, they are shared with the key decision makers quickly, and that we improve our support and our services for some of the most vulnerable people in society. It is a real priority for our Department.

Partly answered

Not addressed: Did not provide specific details or timelines on implementing recommendations from Philippa Day case.

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email