Commons Sense

House of Commons · Ministers' Questions

Topical Questions

Monday 18 January 2021 · 15 questions

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Answered 3 Partly answered 11 Not answered 0

Key points

  • Suzanne Webb thanked teachers and educational staff in Stourbridge for their work during difficult circumstances.
  • The Secretary of State acknowledged delays in implementing the voucher scheme and distributing laptops to students.
  • Kate Green questioned the Secretary of State's delays in various educational support measures during the pandemic.

Topics (select to filter)

Questions & Answers

Context

The MP thanks teachers for their work and asks about the decision to move schools to remote provision.

Question

May I, too, start by thanking all teachers and educational staff in Stourbridge, who continue to do a vital job in the most difficult of circumstances? Although we are asking the vast majority of schools to move to remote provision, does my right hon. Friend agree that it is only right that we, once again, keep schools open for vulnerable children and those whose parents are working on the frontline of our response to this pandemic?

Answer from Gavin Williamson (Secretary of State for Education)

I very much join my hon. Friend and neighbour in thanking all those teachers and support staff who have been doing a brilliant job in Stourbridge in keeping schools open for children of critical workers and for vulnerable children. It is important to emphasise the need to encourage children, especially those in most vulnerable categories, to come into school and continue to have that support and protection that school offers them.

Answered
Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Context

The MP criticises inadequate food parcels provided to students and asks why the voucher system was delayed.

Question

The utterly inadequate school food parcels we saw last week were an absolute scandal, one that was, however, entirely in line with the Government's own guidance. So why has it taken the Secretary of State until the third week of term to initiate a voucher system? Can he tell the House how many parents received vouchers today?

Answer from Gavin Williamson (Secretary of State for Education)

As the hon. Lady would know if she had taken the time to read our guidance, those food parcels did not meet the expectations or the guidance that we set out. They are not acceptable and we have made that clear. We are very keen to ensure that schools have the choice and freedom to choose what is best for children in their school. That is why we have given schools the opportunity to choose food parcels, vouchers that are locally procured or the national voucher scheme. More than 15,000 of those vouchers have already been dispatched today.

Partly answered

Not addressed: The reason for the delay in initiating the voucher system was not addressed specifically.

How: Hedging Language

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Context

The MP criticises the delays in planning and announcing decisions regarding school reopening and exam replacements.

Question

Ah, so we got the answer in the end. The truth is that the Secretary of State was late in planning the voucher scheme, late in getting laptops to students, late in consulting on replacing exams, and late in announcing that students will not return to school in January. After delay after delay, has he finally realised what parents, pupils and staff have known for months, which is that he is just not up to the job?

Answer from Gavin Williamson (Secretary of State for Education)

Time and again, we have recognised where there are real challenges in dealing with the global pandemic. That is why we have taken the action that we have. That is why we are distributing 1.3 million laptops right across the country. That is why we have put the national voucher scheme in place. That is why we are supporting families who are often the most vulnerable and why we will continue supporting families who are the most vulnerable.

Not addressed: The Secretary of State does not address his delays or lack of competence, focusing instead on actions taken to support students and families.

How: Changing Subject

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Context

The MP thanks early years and nursery workers for their efforts during the pandemic and asks about funding solutions for increased costs.

Question

I wish to start by putting on the record my thank you to all those early years and nursery workers in Radcliffe, Whitefield and Prestwich in my constituency. During the pandemic, private nurseries have seen their cleaning costs and the costs of PPE increase fourfold, but, as they are not state run, they get no assistance with those increased costs. Will the Minister meet me to discuss a funding solution that will address this immediate concern while also working towards a meaningful review of early years funding?

Answer from Vicky Ford (Minister for Children and Families)

We have provided unprecedented support to the early years sector throughout the pandemic, through the block-buying childcare places, furlough and other schemes. We are monitoring the current situation really closely and will continue to review it if further measures are needed. For example, where education and childcare settings have an unmet need for PPE, they can access it via their local authority or local resilience forums.

Partly answered

Not addressed: The specific meeting request was not directly addressed; the Minister talks about general support provided.

How: Hedging Language

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Context

The MP asks for a ban on placing looked-after children under 16 in unregulated accommodation and seeks to extend this protection to older children.

Question

As Ministers know, both the children's commissioner and I are keen to get their support for a ban on placing looked-after children in unregulated accommodation, but I understand that the Department wants to do this only for under-16s, which would currently affect 90 or so children. There are many, many more 16 to 18-year-olds in unsafe accommodation who are still legally children and who are still meant to be in our care. Can the Minister explain the justification for treating them differently and, in doing so, potentially putting them at risk of harm?

Answer from Vicky Ford (Minister for Children and Families)

Independent and semi-independent provision can be the right choice for older children who are ready for this where it is high quality and meets their needs. It can enable them to develop their independence as they transition into adult life. However, we are absolutely clear that we need to do more to ensure that the quality of this provision is consistently good, and that this type of provision is simply not appropriate for children under the age of 16 who should be placed in children's homes or foster care.

Partly answered

Not addressed: The specific justification for treating older children differently was not directly provided; focuses on quality issues instead.

How: Hedging Language

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Context

The Department for Education (DFE) has established a hotline for complaints about school lunch parcels. A number of unacceptable photos have surfaced.

Question

I am sure that, like me, my hon. Friend has received a lot of ill-informed and abusive emails and posts on social media about the school lunches. Please will she confirm how many complaints about food parcels the newly established hotline has received?

Answer from Vicky Ford

DFE helplines have been giving support to schools and others on a wide range of matters. By the end of last week, we had received a total of seven calls in relation to unacceptable lunch parcels. Each has been fully investigated.

Answered
Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Q7 Judith Cummins Lab Bradford South
Context

School-age children in Bradford have some of the lowest social mobility rates. The Government has a £1 billion catch-up fund, but only enough places on the national tutoring programme for one in every five disadvantaged pupils.

Question

Ninety primary school headteachers from across Bradford have written to express disappointment about support for teachers and pupils. Will the Minister increase funding for the national tutoring programme as a matter of urgency?

Answer from Nick Gibb

Ensuring that no child suffers a loss to their education or damage to their long-term prospects is a key priority. £1 billion of catch-up funding has been secured from the Treasury, including £350 million for the national tutoring programme and £650 million distributed to schools.

Partly answered

Not addressed: The specific ask for an increase in places on the national tutoring programme was not addressed with a commitment or timeline.

How: Ensuring No Child Suffers Loss As Key Priority, £1 Billion Catch-Up Funding Secured

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Context

A headteacher is concerned about Ofsted assessing schools without agreed standards or precedents for education during the pandemic.

Question

May I urge the Schools Minister to engage closely with headteachers and Ofsted to ensure that any assessment process is fair to schools as they operate now, reflecting difficult circumstances?

Answer from Nick Gibb

Formal inspections are suspended until the summer term. Engagements include monitoring visits for schools rated 'inadequate' or 'requires improvement', discussing curriculum quality, and challenges with remote education.

Partly answered

Not addressed: No direct commitment to fair assessment process in current circumstances.

How: Formal Inspections Suspended Until Summer Term, Engagements Include Monitoring Visits

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Q9 Taiwo Owatemi Lab Coventry North West
Context

The Turing scheme is replacing Erasmus, but concerns have been raised about its potential improvements.

Question

Will the Secretary of State commit to arranging a meeting with colleagues and I to discuss further how to improve the Turing programme?

Answer from Gavin Williamson

The Minister for Universities is delighted to meet the hon. Lady and her colleagues on the all-party parliamentary group to see what more can be done to expand these opportunities right across the United Kingdom.

Answered
Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Context

Teachers in Stockton South are working hard to ensure that deprived youngsters do not fall behind due to school closures.

Question

What is my right hon. Friend doing to ensure that when schools reopen, deprived youngsters can catch up and reach their full potential?

Answer from Gavin Williamson

I echo my hon. Friend's thanks to all teachers in Stockton South for their amazing work last term and now, highlighting the importance of the covid catch-up fund and roll-out of 1.3 million laptops.

Partly answered

Not addressed: No specific measures or commitments were provided.

How: Echoing Thanks To Teachers, Highlighting Importance Of Funding

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Context

A new report from the National Union of Students has found that 69% of student renters are worried about not being able to meet their rental payments.

Question

With rent arrears building up, along with tuition fee debt in England, what additional support can be provided?

Answer from Gavin Williamson

We will always look at how best we can support students. We have announced an additional £20 million of hardship funding for students, to be administered through universities in England.

Partly answered

Not addressed: No commitment to providing access to universal credit or housing support was given.

How: Looking At Best Ways To Support Students, Additional £20 Million Hardship Funding Announced

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Context

Students are facing inadequate teaching, pastoral care issues, and unfair accommodation costs. There is a need for governmental support to ensure students' rights are upheld and they receive appropriate compensation.

Question

Many students have suffered as a result of inadequate teaching and pastoral care at their universities, in addition to unfair costs for accommodation that they are not even allowed to stay in. What action will my right hon. Friend take to ensure that the Government are a voice for students, that they stand up for students and that they allow them to be compensated in some way by their universities when those universities fail them and let them down?

Answer from Gavin Williamson

There can be no excuses when universities are not offering the type of remote teaching and educational support that is expected. That is why it is so critical that, where that remote teaching and support is not happening, students' rights are upheld. We saw at the tail end of last year that students' rights were upheld and universities had to redress that. That is the right approach. We recognise how important it is to support students, which is why we will continue to look at how best we can support them through programmes such as the hardship fund.

Partly answered

Not addressed: The answer does not specify any specific compensation mechanism or action for universities failing students.

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Q13 Stella Creasy Labour (Co-op) Walthamstow
Context

There is concern about the safety of special educational needs pupils, their parents, and staff at those schools as well as nursery settings. The questioner seeks to understand recent meetings with Public Health England regarding evidence of transmission.

Question

Ministers will have heard the concern across the House about the safety of special needs schools and nurseries. To reassure us, can they tell us what meetings they have had over the past two weeks with Public Health England about the evidence of transmission associated with special educational needs pupils, their parents and staff at those schools, and the pupils, parents and staff in nursery settings? What does that evidence tell us about transmission over the last two weeks?

Answer from Vicky Ford

We are in continual contact with Public Health England, through the Department, and we also meet early years representatives. I have been touring special schools virtually throughout. Our early years are vital years of education for the youngest, which they cannot get back, our special schools provide vital support for young people with disabilities, and alternative provision settings are vital for our most vulnerable. All those settings are usually smaller than other settings, which is why they have less of an impact on community transmission —it should be remembered that we closed schools to reduce community transmission—and why PHE continues to advise us that closing them is not needed to bring down the R number.

Partly answered

Not addressed: The answer avoids specifying recent meetings or evidence and discusses general policies regarding special needs settings.

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Context

There is a need to ensure that children can continue to go through the statementing process for educational needs while schools are closed due to COVID restrictions and after they open.

Question

I thank all those teachers who are going over and beyond to ensure that their pupils can access education, virtual or otherwise. What measures is the Department taking to ensure that children can continue to go through the statementing process for educational needs while our schools are closed due to covid restrictions, and after they open?

Answer from Vicky Ford

We have kept our schools open to those with the most severe special needs and disabilities and those with an education, health and care plan. We continue to back up and support local authorities to improve their special educational needs and disabilities provision, to make sure that those young people who need an EHC plan can get one as soon as possible. We are working with councils all across the country.

Partly answered

Not addressed: The answer discusses overall support for SEND provision but does not specify measures for continuing the statementing process during closures.

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Context

The independent review of children's social care is an important commitment that the questioner appreciates did not get pushed aside despite other challenges. The questioner seeks to understand what the review aims to achieve.

Question

I thank my right hon. Friend the Education Secretary for bringing forward the independent review of children's social care. I am hugely grateful that this important manifesto commitment did not find itself on the back burner given all the other challenges we face. Will my right hon. Friend tell the House what he expects the review to achieve for those children in care or on the fringes of care?

Answer from Gavin Williamson

This is something everyone in this House feels incredibly passionately about. I know through seeing at first hand, coming from a family with parents who fostered for many years, how important it is to get high-quality children's social care right in this country. I want a real revolution to come out of this report, and I am incredibly pleased that Josh MacAlister has taken on this role to deliver the changes that I think Members on both sides of the House want. I have said quite clearly that I do not want him to hold back in tackling difficult issues. I want to see change, improvement and children's lives transformed. By working on a cross-party basis, I believe that that is what we can deliver.

Partly answered

Not addressed: The answer does not specify concrete outcomes or measures from the review.

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)