Commons Sense

House of Commons · Ministers' Questions

Housing Development Levies

Monday 11 January 2021 · 2 questions

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Answered 2 Partly answered 0 Not answered 0

Key points

  • Contributions from housing developers see around 7 billion a year invested back into communities.
  • The current system for levies on housing development is not successful and leads to long-winded wrangling.
  • The new infrastructure levy will be simpler and more beneficial for local councils and communities.

Topics (select to filter)

Questions & Answers

Q1 Neil O'Brien Con Harborough, Oadby and Wigston
Context

The question addresses the need for reform in the current system of levies imposed on developers to fund infrastructure and affordable housing. The current system is seen as complex and ineffective.

Question

What progress he is making on reforming levies on housing development?

Answer from Robert Jenrick

Contributions from housing developers see around £7 billion a year invested back into communities, building more homes and vital infrastructure, such as schools and hospitals, and helping to deliver more than 30,000 affordable homes last year. But, as my hon. Friend has raised with me a number of times, the system is still too long-winded and complex. To fix that, we will introduce a flat rate, non-negotiable single infrastructure levy. As set out in the “Planning for the future” White Paper, that will accelerate house building, aim to raise more revenue than under the current process and deliver at least as many on-site affordable homes.

Answered
Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Q2 Neil O'Brien Con Harborough, Oadby and Wigston
Context

The question addresses the need for reform in the current system of levies imposed on developers to fund infrastructure and affordable housing. The current system is seen as complex and ineffective.

Question

Does my right hon. Friend agree that, as well as raising more for the infrastructure that is needed to support new housing, more of the cost should be borne by developers rather than taxpayers, and that we should give more power, freedom and flexibility to local councils about how they spend those revenues in line with local priorities?

Answer from Robert Jenrick

The current system is not successful. It leads to long-winded wrangling. It places the cards in the hands of big developers, rather than local councils, communities and, in particular, small developers, who find it too costly and complex to navigate. The new infrastructure levy will be simpler and more certain and, as my hon. Friend says, it will do two important things. First, it will raise a larger amount of money, capturing more of the uplift in land values, so that more money can be put at the disposal of local communities. Secondly, it will give greater freedom to local councils to decide how they choose to spend that, so that development can benefit communities in flexible ways.

Answered
Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)