Commons Sense

House of Commons · Ministers' Questions

Topical Questions

Thursday 17 December 2020 · 15 questions

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Answered 4 Partly answered 9 Not answered 0

Key points

  • Jonathan Edwards asked about concerns from a businessman in his constituency regarding delays at ports, impacting imports from the continent.
  • Steve Double inquired about the commitment of the Government to match funding for places such as Cornwall through the UK shared prosperity fund.
  • Rachel Reeves raised concerns over the distribution of funds under the port infrastructure fund, highlighting shortfalls faced by Dover and Portsmouth.

Topics (select to filter)

Questions & Answers

Context

The question arises from ongoing negotiations regarding the implementation of the Northern Ireland protocol.

Question

If he will make a statement on his departmental responsibilities. Given that there have been recent developments in the discussions with the European Commission over the Northern Ireland protocol, does the Minister plan to update Parliament on these talks?

Answer from Michael Gove

The House will know that last week I made a statement confirming that vice-president Maroš Šefčovič of the European Commission and I had reached agreement in principle on the implementation of the Northern Ireland protocol. As set out in my written statement issued yesterday, I am pleased to say that vice-president Šefčovič and I shall be meeting again later today in a formal session of the withdrawal agreement Joint Committee. I look forward to updating the House on the outcome of that meeting.

Answered
Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email
Context

A businessman contacted the MP expressing concern about inability to find a haulage firm willing to transport his goods due to current port delays.

Question

I was contacted late last night by a businessman in my constituency who is reliant on imports from the continent. He cannot find a haulage firm willing to carriage on his behalf, due to the current delays at the ports. He is very concerned; unless this issue is resolved, his business will not survive into the new year. What is the Minister's advice to my constituent?

Answer from Michael Gove

I know what a diligent constituency Member the hon. Gentleman is. If he gets in touch with my office, I will be directly in touch with the business concerned.

Partly answered

Not addressed: The Minister did not provide specific advice or action plan to address the issue of port delays impacting businesses.

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email
Context

Concerns about whether the UK shared prosperity fund will match previous EU funding amounts.

Question

The recent announcement by the Chancellor of a £220 million pilot scheme for the shared prosperity fund is a welcome step forward. However, there are some in Cornwall who claim that this is a sign that the Government will break their commitment to match the funding that places such as Cornwall received through the EU. Can my right hon. Friend confirm that the Government are committed to replacing EU funding, which amounted to £1.5 billion per year, in full, and that, as the Prime Minister has stated, Cornwall will receive its share in a dedicated pot?

Answer from Michael Gove

I can absolutely reassure my hon. Friend that, as set out at the spending review, funding for the UK shared prosperity fund will be increased so that it at least matches the EU receipts on average, which reached around £1.5 billion a year. We will publish a UK-wide framework in the spring, which will set out full details, and to help local areas prepare for the introduction of the SPF, we are providing the additional £220 million that my hon. Friend referred to. Of course, we will work closely with Cornwall to ensure that it gets the funding that it needs and for which he is such an effective advocate.

Answered
Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email
Q4 Rachel Reeves Lab Leeds West and Pudsey
Context

The announcement of port infrastructure fund allocations, with concerns over the amount received by specific ports like Dover.

Question

The UK's ports are our gateway to the world. Yesterday, the port infrastructure fund was finally announced. We found out that Dover did not get the £33 million that it asked for; instead, it got just £33,000. Portsmouth faces a shortfall of £8 million. The Minister recently visited that port, so he knows its huge importance. Why have the Government short-changed vital infrastructure critical to the everyday economy, while at the same time wasting millions of pounds on consultants and middlemen as part of Tory cronyism?

Answer from Michael Gove

The hon. Lady raises an important issue. The funding in the port infrastructure fund was specifically available for projects that were due to be delivered by July next year, when full import controls will be in place. Dover was bidding for some infrastructure that would be complete by 2023, which is intended, of course, to take advantage of the new opportunities that control over our borders will bring. We are working with Dover to ensure that a new approach towards juxtaposed controls can be in place.<br/>We are also working with Portsmouth. Portsmouth port is not unique, but it is certainly singular in that it is owned by the local authority, which does a very good job. We are working with the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government, the Department for Transport and others to ensure that not just the port but the broader infrastructure in Portsmouth and that part of Hampshire is sufficient for the needs of port users.

Partly answered

Not addressed: The Minister did not provide a specific reason for Dover receiving less funding than requested.

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email
Q5 Rachel Reeves Lab Leeds West and Pudsey
Context

Concerns over the rationale behind port infrastructure fund decisions, including funding percentages.

Question

I thank the Minister for that answer, but he needs to give greater assurances that there will not be the delays and disruption that we all fear. A letter from the Parliamentary Secretary, Cabinet Office, the hon. Member for Hornchurch and Upminster (Julia Lopez), to my hon. Friend the Member for Portsmouth South (Stephen Morgan) states: “Ministers…decided that all bids which are recommended to be supported will be funded to 66%”. Not 100%, but just 66%. What a false economy given the cost to British businesses and consumers of delays and disruption at the border. Will the Government publish the full rationale for each of their 53 port decisions, not least since some companies received next to nothing while one port company, which coincidentally pays a former Tory Cabinet Minister £100,000 a year, was awarded £26 million yesterday by this Government?

Answer from Michael Gove

Of course, we would be delighted to make sure that the full assessment criteria are shared with the hon. Lady and with all constituency Members. The port infrastructure team had an independent team to look at the eligibility of all the ports that applied and to assess all the bids. They were done on the most rigorous of bases. It is the case that a number of ports have welcomed the additional funding and the additional infrastructure support it will give, but we will continue to work with all ports to ensure we can have a world-class border. The publication today of our future border plan for 2025 lays out the means by which we will do so.

Partly answered

Not addressed: The Minister did not commit to publishing the full rationale for each port decision.

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email
Context

Opportunities for recovery in energy, fishing, food and trade sectors for coastal communities.

Question

The year 2021 will bring significant opportunities for coastal communities such as Lowestoft to drive forward the covid recovery in the energy, fishing, food and trade sectors. Will my right hon. Friend outline the steps he is taking to ensure that the promotion of investment in ports, manufacturing and processing infrastructure is fully and properly co-ordinated between his and other Departments, including the Departments for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, for Transport and for International Trade?

Answer from Michael Gove

My hon. Friend makes a very important point. Lowestoft is a hugely important port. All the ports in Suffolk and those that serve the North sea are ports in which we wish to invest, because, as he rightly points out, their potential, not just when it comes to increased access to our own fishing waters but new investment in renewables, is growing all the time. Our border strategy, which we published today, has been published in consultation with other Government Departments. He is absolutely right that we need to continue to work with them to take advantage of the opportunities of the future.

Answered
Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email
Context

The UK is negotiating with the EU for a free trade agreement but faces immediate tariffs if no deal is reached within two weeks.

Question

Happy Christmas, Mr Speaker. We will not be in the single market or customs union, but the deal offers free trade without tariffs and sovereignty to diverge if we undercut EU standards. Why then, on the last day of Parliament, is the Minister continuing to threaten UK business with no deal?

Answer from Michael Gove

It is the case that the UK Government have been clear about maintaining sovereignty, diverging if needed and full control over our waters. We shall not be ambiguous but are determined to reach a free trade agreement. Our negotiators are working hard towards this.

Partly answered

Not addressed: Specific threats against businesses were not addressed; rather, general commitment to sovereignty and negotiations was provided.

How: Under Review, Working Hard

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email
Context

The ceramics sector in Stoke-on-Trent is integral to the UK economy, with companies like Churchill China and Steelite being global leaders.

Question

I am sure you are aware that the world's finest ceramics come from Stoke-on-Trent. Will my right hon Friend confirm that Stoke-on-Trent companies will continue to remain world leaders in manufacturing and production whether we have a Canada or Australia deal?

Answer from Michael Gove

We ensure that across the world people will continue to use first-class products made in his and neighbouring constituencies, shining a light on the brilliant ceramics sector housed in Stoke-on-Trent.

Partly answered

Not addressed: No specific confirmation was given about maintaining leadership under any deal outcome; instead, emphasis was placed on global recognition of the ceramics industry.

How: Under Review, Working Hard

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email
Context

There is potential for improvement in Government procurement practices, especially within the NHS.

Question

Under the coalition Government, great progress was made to improve Government procurement. Given the current national debt following the covid crisis, will my right hon Friend assure me that the Government will redouble their efforts to improve procurement going forward?

Answer from Michael Gove

We need to improve procurement. The Green Paper published earlier this week is part of that, but I hope to work with him and others on the frontline to ensure that the Department does even better in the future.

Partly answered

Not addressed: No specific timeline or commitment was given; instead, a general reference to ongoing efforts and improvement was provided.

How: Under Review, Working Hard

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email
Context

The Minister previously indicated that nuclear test veterans would be looked after, yet they have not received the promised compensation.

Question

In his previous response to me, the Minister talked about looking after nuclear test veterans. Since they have not received compensation for their exposure to ionising radiation, this is laughable. Is not the real reason these veterans have not received their medal that admitting harmful placement would be an admission?

Answer from Johnny Mercer

This is a very clear process outwith Ministers' control. There is an independent committee looking at medallic recognition, which has made its decision.

Partly answered

Not addressed: Did not address the lack of compensation directly; rather focused on the independent process and decision.

How: Under Review, Working Hard

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email
Context

The British Beer and Pub Association expressed frustration at not being involved early enough in the drafting of guidance related to restrictions on hospitality.

Question

Yesterday, Emma McClarkin told the PACAC Committee about her industry's frustration at not having access to data or involvement in guidance drafting. Will my right hon Friend consider ways to involve the industry as early as possible and share more data for clear guidance?

Answer from Michael Gove

We are all rooting for her. We will be announcing steps to move civil service responsibilities out of Whitehall.

Not addressed: Entirely changed subject from hospitality industry involvement to unrelated matters.

How: Deflection

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email
Context

Derbyshire has a diverse economy and strong culture, prompting the question of civil service decentralization.

Question

Derbyshire is great to live and work in. Will the Minister tell us what steps he is taking to increase the proportion of the civil service based outside London and when they will be coming to Derbyshire?

Answer from Michael Gove

We will announce early in the new year steps towards moving more jobs and responsibilities out of Whitehall into locations such as Derbyshire, Lancashire, and Teesside.

Answered

Not addressed: null

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email
Q13 Ian Lavery Lab Blyth and Ashington
Context

Dominic Cummings' departure from No. 10 with a £40,000 pay increase amid economic hardship for many citizens.

Question

Does the Minister agree that Dominic Cummings receiving a £40,000 pay increase while hundreds of thousands have lost their livelihoods is totally and utterly immoral? And does he recognise that good old British saying 'What is sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander'?

Answer from Michael Gove

I respectfully disagree with the hon. Gentleman on the particular case he mentions, but I agree that working people have made significant sacrifices during the pandemic and thank him for his work to support his constituents' access to the NHS.

Partly answered

Not addressed: Dominic Cummings' departure conditions and pay increase

How: I Respectfully Disagree With The Hon. Gentleman On The Particular Case He Mentions

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email
Context

Businesses in Kensington are major importers, such as Innocent Drinks.

Question

Will the Minister assure me that no stone is being left unturned to negotiate a free trade agreement with Europe for businesses like Innocent Drinks?

Answer from Michael Gove

We are doing everything we can to secure a free trade agreement, but it cannot come at any price. We endorse Innocent Drinks and aim to support the successful trading relationships in Kensington.

Partly answered

How: But Of Course It Cannot Come At Any Price

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email
Q15 Zarah Sultana Your Party Coventry South
Context

Plans to introduce voter ID risk denying millions, particularly marginalised groups like Gypsy, Roma, and Traveller communities, the right to vote.

Question

The Government's plans risk denying millions of people, especially already marginalized groups such as Gypsy, Roma, and Traveller communities, the right to vote. Despite their existing discrimination, neither the equalities impact assessment nor the Electoral Commission's evaluation mentions them. Will the Government scrap these plans?

Answer from Julia Lopez

We will continue to work with charities and civil society organisations, including those representing Traveller and Roma communities, but we have no plans to scrap voter ID. It is important to protect democracy's integrity.

Not addressed: Scrap the voter ID plans

How: We Will Continue To Work With Charities And Civil Society Organisations, But We Have No Plans To Scrap It

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email