Commons Sense

House of Commons · Ministers' Questions

Countryside Protection

Thursday 15 October 2020 · 3 questions

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Answered 0 Partly answered 3 Not answered 0

Key points

  • Minister of State committed to protect 30% of England's territory.
  • Honorable Member acknowledged environmental degradation over past 50 years.
  • Environment Bill to resume Committee passage shortly, addressing supply chain issues.

Topics (select to filter)

Questions & Answers

Context

The MP is concerned about environmental degradation in the countryside including soil degradation, habitat loss, species extinction and water quality issues.

Question

What steps he is taking to protect the countryside. The Secretary of State will know that he is popular in the House, and he is a very mild-mannered, pleasant chap. I want him to turn into some sort of ravening big beast, because he has been in the job nine months, and we have soil degradation, habitat loss and species extinction, while none of our rivers and streams is fit to paddle in, let alone swim in. When is he going to wake up to the crisis that is facing our countryside and do something about it? It is not, “What's the plan, Stan?”; it is “What's the plan, George?”

Answer from George Eustice (Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs)

Within the rich diversity of the English countryside, our existing national parks, areas of outstanding natural beauty and sites of special scientific interest have the highest status of protection. The Prime Minister has signalled our ambition in this area and is committed to protect 30% of our terrestrial land by 2030. The £640 million Nature4Climate fund announced in this year's Budget will drive our progress towards this goal. As we think about the future, it is not enough just to protect particular sites; we need to build back nature in some of these areas. We will be doing that through our new environmental land management policy to replace the common agricultural policy, creating new habitats and creating space for nature. We will also be delivering this through the new approach and governance framework outlined in our Environment Bill.

Partly answered

Not addressed: The MP asked specifically about a detailed plan addressing soil degradation, habitat loss, species extinction and water quality issues, but the response was more general without specific commitments to address these exact concerns.

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email
Context

The MP is concerned about the current state of the countryside and its protection measures. He highlights soil degradation, habitat loss, species extinction and poor water quality as urgent issues.

Question

What steps he is taking to protect the countryside. The Secretary of State will know that he is popular in the House, and he is a very mild-mannered, pleasant chap. I want him to turn into some sort of ravening big beast, because he has been in the job nine months, and we have soil degradation, habitat loss and species extinction, while none of our rivers and streams is fit to paddle in, let alone swim in. When is he going to wake up to the crisis that is facing our countryside and do something about it? It is not, “What's the plan, Stan?”; it is “What's the plan, George?”

Answer from George Eustice (Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs)

The hon. Gentleman paints an accurate picture of the environmental degradation that has taken place, particularly in the past 50 years or so. As we think about the future, it is not enough just to protect particular sites; we need to build back nature in some of these areas. We will be doing that through our new environmental land management policy to replace the common agricultural policy, creating new habitats and creating space for nature. We will also be delivering this through the new approach and governance framework outlined in our Environment Bill.

Partly answered

Not addressed: The MP asked specifically about soil degradation, habitat loss, species extinction and water quality issues but received a general response without specific details or commitments to address these exact issues.

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email
Context

The MP is concerned about the delayed Environment Bill and financial uncertainty for farmers due to upcoming changes in policy.

Question

Our familiar countryside is as it is today because of protection and management, but, as we have heard, the Environment Bill that is needed to maintain that protection has gone missing, and financial support for farmers, who of course do so much to manage our countryside, is just weeks away from major upheaval. The Secretary of State talks about sustainable farming initiatives without bringing any detail to this House, and that is a worry for everybody. Come 1 January, will farmers have the financial information they need to make informed decisions, and will the promised Office for Environmental Protection actually be in place and operating properly?

Answer from George Eustice (Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs)

The Environment Bill will be resuming its passage in Committee shortly. The hon. Gentleman will be aware, for instance, that the Government have recently been consulting on our new approach to introduce due diligence in the supply chain to prevent deforestation. There are good reasons why the Bill has been paused while that consultation is considered. In answer to his question, yes, farmers will have all the information they need by next year, and we will begin the transition to the new policy next year.

Partly answered

Not addressed: The MP asked about specific financial support for farmers and the operational status of the Office for Environmental Protection but received a general response without detailed commitments or timelines.

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email