Commons Sense

House of Commons · Ministers' Questions

Legacy Investigations: Cross-community Support

Wednesday 30 September 2020 · 3 questions

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Answered 0 Partly answered 2 Not answered 0

Key points

  • Mary Foy asked the Secretary of State to confirm the commitment to the principles of the Stormont House agreement and the central involvement of victims' groups in legacy proposals.
  • The Secretary of State reaffirmed the commitment to the principles of the Stormont House agreement, emphasizing the importance of working with all communities, especially victims and their families.
  • Colum Eastwood inquired whether a British paratrooper involved in the killing of 12-year-old Majella O'Hare should be immune from prosecution, to which the Secretary of State declined to comment on specific cases due to sensitivities and complexities.

Topics (select to filter)

Questions & Answers

Q1 Mary Foy Lab City of Durham
Context

The question arises from the need for cross-community support in Northern Ireland's legacy investigations, which have been contentious and lack community-wide agreement.

Question

What steps he is taking to help ensure that Northern Ireland legacy investigations proceed on the basis of cross-community support. The Stormont House agreement was agreed by the overwhelming majority of political parties in Northern Ireland, was endorsed by the British and Irish Governments and had cross-community support. Will the Secretary of State recommit to the principles of Stormont House and reconfirm the central involvement of victims' groups in any legacy proposals?

Answer from Brandon Lewis

Yes, as I outlined at the time of the written ministerial statement, we absolutely do follow through and we intend to follow through on the principles of Stormont House. It is hugely important that we are all working with all communities, and particularly the families and the victims who suffered so much through the troubles.

Partly answered

Not addressed: Specific commitments or timelines for recommitting to the principles of Stormont House were not provided.

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Q2 Mary Foy Lab City of Durham
Context

The question focuses on the victims' payment scheme and its importance in addressing the needs of those affected by the troubles.

Question

Will the Secretary of State recommit to the principles of Stormont House and reconfirm the central involvement of victims' groups in any legacy proposals?

Answer from Brandon Lewis

Yes, as I outlined at the time of the written ministerial statement, we absolutely do follow through and we intend to follow through on the principles of Stormont House. It is hugely important that we are all working with all communities, and particularly the families and the victims who suffered so much through the troubles.

Partly answered

Not addressed: Specific commitments or timelines for recommitting to the principles of Stormont House were not provided.

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Q3 Colum Eastwood Social Democratic & Labour Party Foyle
Context

The question addresses the contentious issue of amnesty for veterans who served in Northern Ireland, citing a specific incident involving Majella O'Hare.

Question

Does the Secretary of State believe that a British paratrooper who shot and killed 12-year-old Majella O'Hare should be immune from prosecution?

Answer from Brandon Lewis

The hon. Gentleman will know that I am unable to comment on any particular cases, but we all recognise the sensitivities, difficulties and complexity of all the issues that come through the troubles, which people in Northern Ireland have been dealing with for a very long time.

Not addressed: Specific stance or position regarding amnesty for veterans involved in incidents like Majella O'Hare's shooting was not addressed.

How: The Hon. Gentleman Will Know That I Am Unable To Comment On Any Particular Cases

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)