Commons Sense

House of Commons · Ministers' Questions

Topical Questions

Thursday 10 September 2020 · 4 questions

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

Read the full transcript on Parliament.uk

At a glance

Answered 4 Partly answered 0 Not answered 0

Key points

  • Luke Pollard asked the Secretary of State to commit his Department to review findings from a climate citizens' assembly on economic recovery and net zero goals.
  • Kenny MacAskill inquired about the impact of Brexit negotiations and the Fisheries Bill on fishing communities, questioning the changes from the previous European Economic Community membership.
  • George Freeman raised concerns about Banham Poultry facing financial difficulties after a covid outbreak, without receiving normal compensation for the loss of production.

Topics (select to filter)

Questions & Answers

Q1 Luke Pollard Labour (Co-op) Plymouth, Sutton and Devonport
Economy Climate
Context

The climate citizens' assembly has presented recommendations for economic recovery to aid in achieving net zero emissions.

Question

Seventy-nine per cent. of the climate citizens' assembly agreed that economic recovery after covid must be designed to help drive net zero, including through greater reliance on local food production and healthier diets. Will the Secretary of State commit his Department to review those findings and act on them?

Answer from The Secretary of State (George Eustice)

We are already running our own reviews in those policy areas through the national food strategy, which is run by Henry Dimbleby. Indeed, the powers in the Agriculture Bill give us precisely the ability to support local projects.

Answered
Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Q2 Kenny MacAskill SNP Skye, Lochaber and Badenoch
Brexit Agriculture & Rural Affairs
Context

Discusses the negative impact of joining the EEC on UK fisheries and concerns over current negotiations.

Question

Fishing communities in my constituency were devastated by the terms negotiated by a Tory Government for European Economic Community membership. Now what little remains is threatened by Brexit negotiations and the Fisheries Bill. Fifty years on, what has changed, other than the constant sell-out of Scottish fishing communities?

Answer from George Eustice (Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food)

I fundamentally disagree with the point made by the hon. Gentleman. It was indeed against the interests of the fishing industry, right across the UK, to join the European Union and the common fisheries policy, which has meant that we have access to only half the fish in our own waters. Leaving the EU means that we can rectify that and get a fair deal for fishermen in every part of the UK, which is why the Scottish industry strongly supports the approach of the British Government.

Answered
Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Q3 George Freeman Con Mid Norfolk
Benefits & Welfare Agriculture & Rural Affairs
Context

Company has suffered significant losses due to a covid outbreak and faces unsustainable financial strain without government assistance.

Question

Following the outbreak of covid among staff of Banham Poultry, in my constituency, more than three weeks ago, the company has had to shut down its plants, and slaughter or sell millions of pounds-worth of its chickens to competitors for pennies, without the compensation it would normally receive for culling in relation to animal health, incurring losses of about £2 million a week. The two family shareholders have made it clear that that is unsustainable without any signal of Government support or progress towards reopening. Given that the company received no help earlier in the year through covid interruption schemes or furloughing, because it was rightly deemed a strategic food business, and has had no compensation for culling, can my right hon. Friend give some signal today, before the company's emergency general meeting tomorrow, that the talks with Government in the past fortnight will lead to some financial support, to avoid the loss of an historic business and local economic devastation?

Answer from George Eustice (Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food)

I thank my hon. Friend for that question. I had a meeting with my officials yesterday to discuss the case. We understand the difficulties that Banham Poultry is facing, and I know that our officials are in constant dialogue with the company, as are officials in other Departments, including Public Health England and the Treasury.

Answered
Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Q4 Munira Wilson Lib Dem Yorks Central
Climate Environment
Context

WWF has published a report highlighting the urgent need for conservation action.

Question

WWF has today published the “Living Planet” report, which paints a shocking picture of global biodiversity loss. However, it also finds that we can restore nature by taking urgent action on conservation and on how we produce and consume food. The Secretary of State mentioned his manifesto commitments on maintaining high environmental standards in trade deals. How can we trust those commitments when this Government cannot even stand by international law?

Answer from George Eustice (Minister for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food)

The WWF report is a wake-up call for everybody around the world. At the heart of every piece of policy in DEFRA is the intention to build back nature, including through our agriculture policy, where we are encouraging sustainable agriculture; through the new targets and governance framework in the Environment Bill; through our approach to sustainable fisheries; and through our work on due diligence in the supply chain. This is a crucial time, and the UK is a world leader here. We have COP26 and the convention on biodiversity, which we will be involved with next year, and we will be championing the environment in all those international forums.

Answered
Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)