Context
Discusses the transfer of patients from North Tees University Hospital to local care homes without proper testing.
Question
Eighteen of 55 patients who tested positive for coronavirus were transferred from North Tees University Hospital into local care homes between 1 March and 15 April. That was directly in line with Government advice that a negative test was not required before discharge. A further 266 were transferred without a test. The policy changed on 16 April, but does the Minister accept that many deaths on Teesside, and perhaps thousands across the country, could have been prevented if the Government had got it right in the first place?
Answer from The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government (Simon Clarke)
I pay enormous tribute to the care workers on Teesside and of course to our local NHS, which we share as Teesside MPs. This has been a constantly evolving and very complex situation, as Governments around the world, including our own, have obviously learned as matters have progressed. We have acted consistently and in good faith throughout. We have worked very hard with the care sector to protect patients. The £600 million infection control fund that we have instigated is designed to ensure that the care sector is safe, with a strong measure of containment against the disease for patients going forward.
Not addressed: The minister did not directly address whether deaths could have been prevented if proper testing protocols were followed earlier.
How: Stressed Complexity And Evolving Nature Of Situation, Acknowledged Work With Care Sector
Was this summary accurate? Tell us
How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)