Commons Sense

House of Commons · Ministers' Questions

Public Transport: Face Coverings

Thursday 2 July 2020 · 1 question

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Answered 1 Partly answered 0 Not answered 0

Key points

  • The Department is working closely with transport operators and the police to monitor compliance with face coverings on public transport.
  • Initial reports indicate very high compliance, around 86% according to the Office for National Statistics for the week of 26 June.
  • Wearing a face covering is encouraged as an easy way to help protect everyone from coronavirus, especially in confined spaces.

Topics (select to filter)

Questions & Answers

Q1 David Evennett Con Bexleyheath and Crayford
Context

Discusses the requirement for public transport users to wear face coverings as a preventive measure against coronavirus.

Question

What assessment has the Department made of the level of compliance by public transport users in wearing face coverings? Wearing a face covering is an easy way to help protect us all from coronavirus, especially in more confined spaces such as public transport. Will my right hon. Friend join me in urging constituents in Bexleyheath and Crayford to make that small change which can help control the virus and save lives?

Answer from The Prime Minister (Grant Shapps)

We are working closely with transport operators and the police to monitor compliance. Initial reports from operators suggest very high compliance, around 86% according to the Office for National Statistics for the week of 26 June. We have said that in the early days we would ensure compliance was enforced gently, but I inform the House that TfL, Network Rail and British Transport police will be tightening up on that. I have just signed the Health Protection (Coronavirus, Wearing of Face Coverings on Public Transport) (England) Regulations 2020, which under regulation 8 give powers to TfL to increase enforcement.

Answered
Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)