Context
The shadow Secretary of State questions the efficacy of the test and trace strategy.
Question
In recent days, I have been listening to excuses from the Secretary of State. He is like Eric Morecambe in that he plays all the right notes but not necessarily in the right order. Local areas such as Leicester still do not have local data; GPs cannot refer people for testing; NHS staff are not tested regularly; and tracers at a Serco and Sitel call centre say they have nothing to do. This is not world-beating, it's like a wing and a prayer. When will we get a functional test, trace and isolate strategy?
Answer from Matthew Hancock (The Secretary of State for Health and Social Care)
The shadow Secretary of State is far better when he supports the Government than when he pretends to oppose them. We have seen him explaining why steps taken by the Government are sensible, why it's important to move from a national lockdown as much as possible to local outbreak control, and why test and trace is important. When he criticises spending on protecting the NHS and implementing actions needed to exit lockdown as wasted money, that appears to be opposition for its own sake.
Not addressed: The inefficacy of current testing and tracing measures
How: Shifts Blame, Personal Attack
Was this summary accurate? Tell us
How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)