Commons Sense

House of Commons · Ministers' Questions

Universal Basic Income

Wednesday 6 May 2020 · 1 question

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Answered 1 Partly answered 0 Not answered 0

Key points

  • Ministerial discussions on universal basic income focused on its potential merits for social equality.
  • The Minister stated that a universal basic income is not the most effective method to target those in need.
  • Government measures to address the coronavirus include targeted assistance delivered through existing systems.

Topics (select to filter)

Questions & Answers

Context

Discussion on whether a universal basic income could better address social inequalities compared to targeted support measures.

Question

What recent discussions has the Minister had with Cabinet colleagues regarding the potential merits of a universal basic income for achieving social equality? Does the Minister agree that taking a universal approach is necessary to prevent people from falling through the cracks and would consulting with devolved Administrations, all-party parliamentary groups, and expert organisations help in making a guaranteed minimum income work?

Answer from Kemi Badenoch (Minister for Women and Equalities)

A universal basic income is not seen as the best way to deliver social equality because it does not target those who need help most. The Government's response to the coronavirus includes targeted measures that can be quickly delivered through existing systems. While willing to continue debate, flat-rate payments do not account for variable essential living costs and fail to support groups like disabled people and lone parents adequately.

Answered

Not addressed: Consultation with devolved Administrations on universal basic income

How: Continuing The Debate, Lack Of Flexibility In Ubi

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)