Commons Sense

House of Commons · Ministers' Questions

Civil Partnerships

Thursday 6 February 2020 · 1 question

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Answered 1 Partly answered 0 Not answered 0

Key points

  • Ministerial Questions took place on 2020-02-06 regarding Civil Partnerships
  • Ben Bradshaw from Lewes inquired if the Commissioners were consulted on recent Church guidance on civil partnerships
  • The Minister assured to feed back the concern to the College of Bishops and noted the archbishops' apology for jeopardising trust in the Living in Love and Faith project

Topics (select to filter)

Questions & Answers

Context

The question concerns the lack of consultation with the Church Commissioners regarding recent guidance by the Church on civil partnerships and the subsequent apology for causing division and hurt.

Question

Whether the Commissioners were consulted on recent guidance by the Church on civil partnerships; and if he will make a statement. Regardless of that, it was discourteous not to inform the Second Church Estates Commissioner as the legislation passed with all-party support in this House. It is bad enough the Church treats LGBT+ members as second-class Christians but saying civil partnerships should not exist because parents should not have had or be having sex is hurtful.

Answer from Andrew Selous (Second Church Estates Commissioner)

I will certainly feed back the right hon. Gentleman's strongly felt concern on this issue to the College of Bishops. In their apology, the archbishops did recognise that the pastoral statement had jeopardised the trust that has been built up as part of the Living in Love and Faith project, which is intended to discern the way forward for the Church of England on this issue.

Answered
Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)

Get updates like this by email