Commons Sense

House of Commons · Ministers' Questions

EU Bilateral Trade

Thursday 23 January 2020 · 1 question

Summarised by AI from the official record, so it can contain mistakes.

At a glance

Answered 1 Partly answered 0 Not answered 0

Key points

  • The end of freedom of movement in the UK was discussed in relation to its effect on bilateral trade with the EU.
  • Scottish Financial Enterprise highlighted the reliance of Scotland's financial industry on the freedom of movement for success.
  • The UK government stated that leaving the EU allows for the introduction of a fairer immigration system.

Topics (select to filter)

Questions & Answers

Context

The UK's decision to leave the European Union and end freedom of movement has led to concerns about its impact on trade relationships.

Question

What assessment her Department has made of the effect of the end of freedom of movement in the UK on bilateral trade with the EU in goods and services. Scottish Financial Enterprise told the Scottish Affairs Committee that the success of Scotland's financial industry was based on its ability to access and service all customers in the European Union. Does this not once again highlight the vital importance of freedom of movement to Scotland and show that the UK Government simply do not care about Scotland's interests or, indeed, Scotland's votes?

Answer from Conor Burns (Minister for Europe and the Americas)

Leaving the European Union frees the United Kingdom to introduce a fairer immigration system. My right hon. Friend the Prime Minister said at the UK-Africa investment summit this week that our system is becoming fairer and more equal as between all our global friends and partners. Treating people the same regardless, wherever they come from and by putting people before passports, we will be able to attract the best talent from around the world, wherever they may be. We will also be able to reach out and strike new global trade agreements to the benefit of all our constituents and UK consumers.

Answered

Not addressed: The human cost of taking control of borders was not addressed.

Was this summary accurate? Tell us

How accurate was this summary? (1 = poor, 5 = spot on)