House of Lords Appointments 2021-11-25
2021-11-25
TAGS
Response quality
Questions & Answers
Q1
Partial Answer
▸
Context
The question arises from concerns about the fairness and transparency in the process of peerage appointments.
If the Government will conduct a review of the process for appointing peers to the House of Lords. The Minister may deny that the House of Lords is crony-stuffed, but 15 of the last 16 Tory treasurers gave £3 million to the Tory party to get a life peerage and 80% of the UK public think that corruption is fairly or very present in our politics.
The Government do not currently plan to conduct a review. Peerages reflect long-standing contributions to civic life and give these people an opportunity to put something back and contribute to public life.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Abolishing the House of Lords, corruption in appointments
Peerages Reflect Contributions To Civic Life
Response accuracy
Q2
Partial Answer
▸
Context
The question arises from concerns that many peers appointed since 2010 were ennobled due to their financial contributions rather than talent.
About half the peers in the House of Lords have been ennobled since 2010, with most—I am being charitable—not for their sheer luminosity of talent but the generosity of their bank balance. Does the Minister not see that having a Chamber of cheque writers undermines the credibility of not just the House of Lords but the entirety of Parliament? Is it not time that we just got rid of it?
The answer to the hon. Gentleman's final point is no. Peerages reflect long-standing contributions to civic life and a willingness to further contribute to public life.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Abolishing the House of Lords
Peerages Reflect Contributions To Civic Life
Response accuracy
Q3
Partial Answer
▸
Context
The question arises from concerns that many peers appointed since 2010 were ennobled due to their financial contributions rather than talent, leading to perceptions of corruption.
If the Government will conduct a review of the process for appointing peers to the House of Lords. The Minister may deny that the House of Lords is crony-stuffed, but 15 of the last 16 Tory treasurers gave £3 million to the Tory party to get a life peerage and 80% of the UK public think that corruption is fairly or very present in our politics.
I have a lot of time for the hon. Lady, but we will not be abolishing the House of Lords any time soon. Peerages reflect long-standing contributions to civic life and give these people an opportunity to put something back and contribute to public life.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Abolishing the House of Lords
Peerages Reflect Contributions To Civic Life
Response accuracy
Q4
Partial Answer
▸
Context
The question arises from concerns that there is a link between party donations and nominations to sit in the House of Lords.
At last week's Liaison Committee, my hon. Friend the Member for Na h-Eileanan an Iar (Angus Brendan MacNeil) asked the Prime Minister if he would stop sending big-value donors to the House of Lords. The Prime Minister replied: Until you get rid of the system by which the trades union barons fund other parties…we need to continue with the system by which public-spirited people give donations. Mr Speaker, I believe that the Prime Minister's answer comes dangerously close to an admission of selling peerages, in direct contravention of the Honours (Prevention of Abuses) Act 1925, and is worthy of further investigation. Will the Minister undertake that investigation or does he think it is sufficiently serious to involve the Metropolitan police?
Again, the answer is no. One of the most valued aspects of the House of Lords is the experience that Members bring to their work. The idea that successful businesspeople and philanthropists who contribute to political causes should be disqualified from sitting in the legislature is nonsense.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Investigation into peerage appointments
Members Of The House Of Lords Bring Valuable Experience
Response accuracy
Q5
Partial Answer
▸
Context
The question arises from concerns that there is a link between party donations and nominations to sit in the House of Lords.
I admire the Minister's ability to say that with a straight face. It is disappointing but not surprising that he appears to believe there is absolutely nothing wrong with the system. Maybe he can take this opportunity to explain why, since 2010, no fewer than 22 of the Tories' biggest backers, who have donated a total of £54 million to their coffers, have been elevated to the House of Lords. Will he explain why he believes that stuffing the House of Lords full of wealthy donors, cronies, political allies and those unwilling or unable to be elected somehow enhances and improves our democracy?
Again, successful businesspeople should not be disqualified from sitting in the legislature. The hon. Gentleman made a point about the number of people who have been appointed since 2010. I gently point out that there are just over 800 Members of the House of Lords and 408 of them were appointed by the Opposition when they were in power between 1997 and 2010.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Explanation on recent appointments
Members Of The House Of Lords Bring Valuable Experience
Response accuracy
Q6
Partial Answer
▸
Context
The question arises from concerns that the size of the House of Lords is too large.
It is good to have a bicameral Parliament, but is not the fundamental problem with the House of Lords simply that it is too large and not enough of them turn up? There are 800 peers compared with 650 MPs, and in the Divisions this month, the average turnout was 378, which is 47%.
My hon. Friend makes a good point, but given retirements and other departures, some new Members are essential to keep the expertise and the outlook of the Lords fresh. We continue to support and encourage the policy of Members of the House of Lords retiring.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Reducing the size of the House of Lords
Some New Members Are Essential To Keep Expertise Fresh
Response accuracy