British Embassy Relocation Jerusalem 2022-11-08
2022-11-08
TAGS
Response quality
Questions & Answers
Q1
Partial Answer
▸
Context
No specific events or incidents mentioned, but the question arises from a concern over the UK's diplomatic stance and its implications on international law.
What assessment he has made of the potential effect of relocating the British embassy in Israel to Jerusalem. I am very pleased to hear that, as I know my constituents will be. However, why was that move ever under consideration, given that last month at the United Nations, 143 countries, including Israel and the UK, voted to reaffirm that any unilateral annexation of territory by another state is a violation of international law? Navi Pillay, the former UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, has observed that unless that principle is applied equally to the Occupied Palestinian Territories, including East Jerusalem, it would become meaningless. Is this not just another example of the Conservative party's chaotic approach to international relations that has so badly undermined the UK's reputation on the global stage?
There are no plans to move the UK embassy in Israel from Tel Aviv. The Government have looked at this issue. We will continue to work to ensure that we are in the best position possible to continue promoting peace and stability in the region and supporting a two-state solution.
▸
Assessment & feedback
The reasons for considering moving the embassy were not addressed, nor was there a detailed explanation of how the current stance aligns with international law.
Response accuracy
Q2
Partial Answer
▸
Context
Continuation of the previous question, focusing on the consistency and international implications of UK's diplomatic actions.
I am very pleased to hear that, as I know my constituents will be. However, why was that move ever under consideration, given that last month at the United Nations, 143 countries, including Israel and the UK, voted to reaffirm that any unilateral annexation of territory by another state is a violation of international law? Navi Pillay, the former UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, has observed that unless that principle is applied equally to the Occupied Palestinian Territories, including East Jerusalem, it would become meaningless. Is this not just another example of the Conservative party's chaotic approach to international relations that has so badly undermined the UK's reputation on the global stage?
There are no plans to move the British embassy in Israel from Tel Aviv. The Government have looked at this issue. We will continue to work to ensure that we are in the best position possible to continue promoting peace and stability in the region and supporting a two-state solution.
▸
Assessment & feedback
The reasons for considering moving the embassy were not addressed, nor was there a detailed explanation of how the current stance aligns with international law.
Response accuracy
Q3
Partial Answer
▸
Context
No specific background given, but the question builds on previous discussions about the UK's stance regarding its embassy in Israel.
I welcome the Minister's update. Will he reaffirm that that is the long- standing position of our country; that it is the right position internationally; that the work done by our consulate-general in Jerusalem is extremely valued and complements what is happening in our embassy in Tel Aviv; and that that will continue to be the case?
My hon. Friend has real expertise on the issue. Yes, I completely agree with him.
▸
Assessment & feedback
The question sought specific reaffirmations and details about the UK's diplomatic position but received a vague agreement without specifics.
Response accuracy