Fire Defects Remediation Costs 2024-04-22
2024-04-22
TAGS
Response quality
Questions & Answers
Q1
Partial Answer
▸
Context
Leaseholders and tenants are facing significant costs for cladding remediation, which they believe should be the responsibility of developers.
What steps is the Government taking to prevent leaseholders and tenants from paying for the remediation of fire defects? In Eltham and Chislehurst, residents in Master Gunner Place and Grove Place are concerned about being charged excessively for service charges related to cladding surveys.
No leaseholder in a building above 11 metres will be liable for cladding remediation costs. We are making those responsible pay, where possible. Transparency in service charges is vital; we have highlighted this importance in recent communications and the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Bill aims to transform transparency on service charges.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Did not directly address excessive service charge concerns in specific locations mentioned by the MP
Response accuracy
Q2
Partial Answer
▸
Context
Residents in Eltham and Chislehurst, including Master Gunner Place and Grove Place, are facing significant increases in service charges related to cladding remediation surveys.
Residents of Master Gunner Place and Grove Place are concerned about being charged for fire remediation work and excessive service charge increases. The MP seeks transparency and action from the Government on these issues.
We agree that leaseholders should have transparency regarding their service charges. We have taken steps to highlight this through a joint letter and are working on reforms in the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Bill.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Did not provide specific actions or timeline for addressing excessive charges in Master Gunner Place and Grove Place
Response accuracy
Q3
Direct Answer
▸
Context
The Government has provided protection for leaseholders and renters above 11 metres in terms of fire remediation costs, but not below this height.
Why are leaseholders not protected when fire remediation measures are necessary below 11 metres?
The Building Safety Act 2022 differentiated protections based on building height. We asked for examples of issues below 11 metres and received few, with only three problematic cases currently being addressed.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Response accuracy
Q4
Partial Answer
▸
Context
The Government provided more than £2 billion to private leaseholders for fire safety works but only £200 million to social housing providers.
Social housing providers received a fraction of the funding given to private leaseholders, leading to social tenants having to pay full remediation costs out of their rent. Is this fair?
We are trying to ensure that taxpayer subsidy for remediation is clawed back from those responsible for issues, and we have been happy to talk with registered providers where necessary.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Did not commit to specific actions or timeline to address the funding disparity
Response accuracy
Q5
Partial Answer
▸
Context
Soaring service charges are placing a financial strain on leaseholders due to building insurance premiums and the new building safety regime.
Leaseholders are being pushed to their limits financially by unreasonable service charge demands. The MP asks whether the Government's current measures in the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Bill are sufficient or if further action is needed.
Our substantial reform package aims to improve transparency and reduce problems through the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Bill. When issues arise, we are keen to look at them and take action where possible.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Did not commit to specific additional measures beyond what is already proposed in the bill
Response accuracy