Intelligence and Security Committee 2025-06-05
2025-06-05
TAGS
Response quality
Questions & Answers
Q1
Partial Answer
▸
Context
The MP is concerned about the lack of significant progress in combating gangs and stopping illegal immigration through security operations. He references a specific plan proposed by Rishi Sunak to address these issues.
What recent engagement has his Department had with the Intelligence and Security Committee regarding why our normally sophisticated operations have not succeeded in making any significant dent in smashing the gangs and stopping the boats? Perhaps he might ask the Committee whether its view is that such is the pull factor and the desperation of these people that the only way we will stop the boats is to do what my right hon. Friend the Member for Richmond and Northallerton (Rishi Sunak) was going to do: arrest them, deport them and send them back to where they came from.
I am not quite sure that was the previous Government’s plan—maybe the right hon. Gentleman wishes it was. This is a hugely important issue for us. It is a security issue as well as an immigration issue. Of course, international policing and security operations to stop these gangs and this trade is a vital part of trying to combat it.
▸
Assessment & feedback
The MP asked about specific discussions with the Committee on operational failures but the answerer did not confirm or deny such discussions; instead offered general remarks.
Did Not Address Specific Question
Provided Vague Response
Response accuracy
Q2
Partial Answer
▸
Context
The MP cites a public criticism by the Intelligence and Security Committee over its lack of adequate staff and independence, leading to an inability to properly oversee the £3 billion annual spend. The Committee is seeking more resources and direct access to the Prime Minister.
Has the Prime Minister deigned to meet the Intelligence and Security Committee? I also asked written questions about the independence and resources of the Committee and was told that discussions were ongoing. On a matter of this seriousness, does Parliament not deserve more than fob-off half-answers, and will the Minister provide further details now?
I do not think the shadow Minister listened to my first answer. For the avoidance of doubt, I said that we have agreed to the Committee’s requested uplift on budgeting and resourcing. Of course, the Prime Minister will be happy to meet the Committee at a convenient time that both can agree.
▸
Assessment & feedback
The MP asked for specific details on discussions but received vague reassurances instead of concrete information or timelines.
Did Not Provide Specific Details
Repeated Previous Answer
Response accuracy