Channel Crossings Military Assets 2025-09-08

2025-09-08

TAGS
Response quality

Questions & Answers

Q1 Partial Answer
Peter Bedford Con
Mid Leicestershire
Context
The MP references the national security risk posed by illegal migrants crossing the English Channel and the need for physical measures to stop small boats from landing.
Given the national security risk posed by some of those who cross the English channel illegally, I ask the Minister to look again at using military assets to physically stop those small boats from landing in the first place. Will he do that today?
I am grateful to the hon. Gentleman for his question and I share his passion for keeping our country safe. However, I refer him to the work of Operation Isotrope, a military operation undertaken by the last Conservative Government that put the Navy in charge of securing the English channel. That operation concluded that naval assets were not suitable for stopping small boats; it is already a dangerous crossing and using military assets only made it more dangerous. The armed forces are now assisting the Home Office and Border Security Command, looking at how we can provide accommodation to close asylum hotels and speed up the processing of asylum applications.
Assessment & feedback
Commitment to reconsider use of military assets
Referencing Previous Government'S Work
Response accuracy
Q2 Partial Answer
Context
The MP mentions the MOD's consideration of using military barracks for housing asylum seekers, citing concerns about operational responsibility falling to armed forces after previous criticisms during Operation Isotrope.
While I thank him for his efforts to help address the small boats crisis by providing logistical planning support, I personally do not feel that operational responsibility for that should fall to our armed forces. The experience of Operation Isotrope under the Boris Johnson Government—widely criticised by the previous Defence Committee for causing confusion and reputational risk and for straining our already pressured military—serves as a clear warning. Can the Minister therefore issue iron-clad assurances to the House that any future MOD involvement within this field will be strictly limited, clearly defined and not strain our already pressured military?
I thank the Chair of the Select Committee for his question. The Ministry of Defence is part of the cross-Government response to small boats. We are stepping up our support to assist our colleagues in the Home Office. The Home Office remains the lead Department, but every Department can contribute something to this effort and it is right that the Ministry of Defence does so. We continue to protect the nation and deliver the changes as laid out in the strategic defence review.
Assessment & feedback
Commitment to strict limitations on MOD involvement
Stating Mod'S Role But Not Providing Assurances
Response accuracy