Criminal Justice System Efficiency Technology 2025-03-11
2025-03-11
TAGS
Response quality
Questions & Answers
Q1
Partial Answer
▸
Context
Between 2016 and 2022, there was a 25% reduction in cases concluded in the criminal justice system. The government announced 110,000 sitting days to address efficiency.
I am concerned about using technology to streamline our justice system. Between 2016 and 2022, there was a 25% reduction in cases being concluded. What plans do the Government have to use emerging new tech to enhance court processing, get faster justice for victims, and help manage offenders in the community, including through ankle tagging to enforce exclusion zones, and drug and alcohol testing?
We have expanded the use of tagging; we are piloting new technology to automate manual work in the justice system; and I have launched a new unit, Justice AI, to further develop the use of artificial intelligence. Sir Brian Leveson is conducting an independent review of criminal courts to improve efficiency. We will consider how to improve the courts' efficiency and enhance tagging and monitoring for exclusion zones and curfews.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Response accuracy
Q2
Partial Answer
▸
Context
The use of electronic tags is seen as a way to improve the efficiency of the criminal justice system and mitigate the need for expensive prison places.
Will the Lord Chancellor accept that the effective use of electronic tags will not only make the criminal justice system more efficient, but also mitigate the need for expensive prison places? What can be done to ensure that the tags are technically reliable and that officials in her Department have the commercial capacity to manage contracts efficiently?
I agree that reliable electronic tags can improve the efficiency of the criminal justice system and reduce prison costs. The Department is ensuring expertise in technology, setting up a new unit called Justice AI to manage contracts efficiently and maintain public confidence.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Response accuracy
Q3
Partial Answer
▸
Context
The Department of Justice released dozens of dangerous prisoners by mistake last year. Some criminals were not monitored for up to eight weeks as they did not have electronic tags.
How many criminals did her Department fail to tag? Were any offences committed while these criminals went unmonitored, and who has been held accountable for this gross incompetence?
I inherited a contract from the previous government with Serco, which I am holding accountable. The delays are unacceptable; Serco’s performance is not good enough, but the backlog has been reduced. Further financial penalties will be imposed where necessary.
▸
Assessment & feedback
specific numbers of prisoners who were not tagged and accountability measures for oversight
I Inherited A Contract From The Previous Government
Serco’S Performance Is Still Not Good Enough
Response accuracy
Q4
Partial Answer
▸
Context
The Department's ability to tag prisoners properly is questioned, raising concerns about public trust in using electronic tags as an alternative to short prison sentences.
If her Department cannot even tag prisoners properly, why should the public have any confidence in her plan to use tags in place of short prison sentences? The threshold for a prison sentence is already high. Will the Justice Secretary take this opportunity to reassure the public and rule out reducing sentences for burglary, theft or shoplifting?
When my predecessor’s Government left office, prisons were on the point of collapse. We will ensure that prison places are available for those who need to be locked up to keep the public safe. We will expand punishment outside prison and help offenders turn their back on crime.
▸
Assessment & feedback
reassuring the public about electronic tags instead of short sentences and ruling out reduced sentences for specific crimes
Prisons Were On The Point Of Collapse
We Will Ensure That Prison Places Are Always Available
Response accuracy