Classroom Disruption Smartphones 2025-07-21

2025-07-21

TAGS
Response quality

Questions & Answers

Q1 Partial Answer
Neil Hudson Con
Epping Forest
Context
Dr Hudson references a local school policy restricting mobile phones and criticizes the Government's refusal to implement a national ban despite evidence from UNESCO, OECD, and the Children’s Commissioner. He mentions that young people support such policies.
Many of the young people I meet in schools across Epping Forest are clear that they agree with the local school policy of restricting mobile phones when they are at school. Sadly, however, the Government have repeatedly refused to heed Conservative calls to protect our children with a national ban on phones in schools—even voting against it. Bodies such as UNESCO and the OECD are crystal clear about the negative impacts of phones on young people’s education, so when will the Government listen to the evidence and to our school leaders, and support a ban on smartphones in schools for the sake of our young people’s education and mental health?
I have said that phones should not be out in schools, and heads have the power to enforce that. The Opposition backed those measures. If they felt they needed to go further, they had 14 long years in which to do so.
Assessment & feedback
The specific request for a national ban on smartphones was not addressed; instead, the Minister referenced past government actions and questioned the Opposition's position.
Changing Subject Questioning Opponent
Response accuracy
Q2 Partial Answer
Caroline Voaden LD
South Devon
Context
Ms Voaden describes a meeting with parents concerned about the impact of smartphones on their children's education and mental health. She highlights the case of Kingsbridge community college implementing a smartphone-free policy.
Last Thursday, I felt the fear in a hall full of parents of primary school children in Totnes as they listened to campaigners going through the evidence of the impact of smartphones on kids at secondary school. There is a clear safeguarding issue around kids seeing videos of hardcore pornography and violence.

I am therefore pleased that Tina Graham, the head of Kingsbridge community college, has just announced a smartphone-free policy from September to protect children, which will mean no phones in school at all except for reasonable adjustments. That is a much better policy than the “Not seen—put it in your bag” policy that most schools follow. In the light of such safeguarding concerns, where every child is only as safe as the least safe phone in school, why will the Minister not do the one thing that could transform our children’s mental and physical health, and school attainment and direct all schools to go smartphone free?
The hon. Lady’s question demonstrates that mobile phones have no place in schools, and there is already guidance to reflect that. The mobile phones in schools guidance is clear and schools should prohibit the use of devices with smart technology throughout the school day, including during lessons, transitions and breaks. We expect all schools to take steps in line with that guidance to ensure that mobile phones do not disrupt pupils’ learning. If pupils fail to follow those rules, schools should have the power to confiscate devices.
Assessment & feedback
The specific request for a direct instruction was avoided; instead, existing guidelines were reiterated.
Reiterating Existing Policy
Response accuracy