Aviation Sector 2025-05-15
2025-05-15
TAGS
Response quality
Questions & Answers
Q1
Direct Answer
▸
Context
SaxonAir, Norwich airport and Norfolk and Suffolk county councils launched Aviation East to make East Anglia the heart of aviation innovation. The region is leading in electric aircraft development and sustainable aviation fuel.
We are already leading in the development of electric aircraft and the early availability of sustainable aviation fuel, but we could do so much more to unlock growth and deliver jobs. Will the Minister outline how this Government will support aviation in the east? I am due to meet him soon, but will he also come to Norwich, take a flight in an electric plane and see what innovation is under way?
This Government want to see the UK maximise the benefits of the future of flight technologies, including flying taxis, both for the economy and for communities. We recently announced over £20 million of Government funding for the Civil Aviation Authority and the future flight challenge to deliver the future flight programme this year. That joint programme between industry, Government and the CAA will enhance drone capability by 2027, with flying taxis in the UK’s skies by 2028. I would be delighted to visit Norwich and the airport in my hon. Friend’s constituency.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Response accuracy
Q2
Partial Answer
▸
Context
The Government have supported and signed off on the development consent order for Manston airport in Sir Roger's constituency. It is expected that funding will be finalised soon, allowing work to start.
As the Minister is well aware, the Government have supported and signed off on the development consent order for Manston airport in my constituency. It is hoped and expected that the final private funding for that package will be in place and that work will start in the very near future. Will the Minister now reaffirm his support for the contribution that Manston can and will make to freight and growth in the United Kingdom, and can he also seek to expedite the necessary licences at the appropriate time?
I was delighted to spend my Easter holiday in the right hon. Member’s constituency, cycling the Cantii way. I stopped and took a look at Manston airport—and a sip of water from my bottle, because it was a hot day. I am looking forward to the outcome of the talks and the funding, and at that point I will be happy to look at the proposals from Manston and sit down with the right hon. Member to unlock that capacity.
▸
Assessment & feedback
The Minister did not directly affirm support or promise expedited licensing but said he would review proposals once funding is in place.
Looking Forward
Sit Down With The Right Hon. Member
Response accuracy
Q3
Evasion / No Answer
▸
Context
Air passenger duty was introduced over 30 years ago by a Conservative Chancellor. Every study shows that the revenue generated is less than the economic benefit of abolishing it.
My hon. Friend will be as aware as I am that the air passenger duty, which was introduced by a Conservative Chancellor more than 30 years ago, has been studied intensively. Every study shows that the revenue generated by that tax is much less than the benefit of abolishing it. Will my hon. Friend and the Secretary of State try to talk some sense into the Chancellor of the Exchequer and her officials, to get rid of this tax and benefit both aviation and the economy?
I would never disagree with the former leader of my council, but on this occasion, I might have to. I pay tribute to my hon. Friend as somebody who was chairman of the airport that delivered the only international runway in this country in 80 years. Air passenger duty is part of the rich mix of the aviation tapestry; however, last month in April, Heathrow had 7.1 million passengers through its doors, the largest number ever. Most airports and airlines are seeing demand go through the roof.
▸
Assessment & feedback
The Minister did not agree to discuss air passenger duty but focused on current aviation trends.
Pay Tribute
Rich Mix
Response accuracy
Q4
Partial Answer
▸
Context
The Climate Change Committee advised that no airport expansion should proceed without a UK-wide capacity management framework to reflect the cumulative impact of emissions.
I recognise the vital importance of the aviation sector, but any airport expansion—including at Bristol airport—should reflect the cumulative impact of emissions and our legal commitment to net zero. Does the Minister support the Climate Change Committee’s advice, published last year, that no airport expansion should proceed without a UK-wide capacity management framework?
First, I congratulate Bristol on the excellent job it is doing and the growth it is seeing. We have strict criteria on carbon emissions, noise, growth and pollution at our airports. That is our guiding principle as a Government, but we also want to see local ambition in terms of growth. Those carbon budgets are fixed; we still want to reach net zero by 2050, even with the growth in our air markets that is expected over the next few years.
▸
Assessment & feedback
The Minister did not fully commit to a UK-wide capacity management framework but mentioned strict criteria and carbon budgets.
Guiding Principle
Local Ambition
Response accuracy
Q5
Evasion / No Answer
▸
Context
Labour's Employment Rights Bill could affect passengers' ability to travel without disruption or additional costs due to reduced notice periods for strike action.
As we approach the summer holidays, we know that many families are looking forward to the opportunity to get away. However, in what may come as concerning news, Labour’s Employment Rights Bill could threaten passengers’ ability to travel without disruption or additional costs. This is because in existing passenger rights legislation, under article 5(1)(c)(i) of Regulation 261, passengers are entitled to compensation if they are informed of cancellations less than two weeks before their flight. The Employment Rights Bill reduces the required notice period for strike action in any industry from 14 days to 10 days, increasing the risk of last-minute cancellations. That could in theory cost airlines tens of millions of pounds, which could in turn lead to higher costs for passengers as airlines pass the expenses on to the travelling public. Does the Minister agree that the Government should maintain the 14-day notice period in aviation, putting the interests of passengers ahead of those of their union friends?
The shadow Secretary of State will forgive me if I have not read that sub-paragraph that trips off the tongue. This Government will always put passengers first. That is why more passengers than ever are flying in our skies and leaving our airports. The Department is fully engaged with the aviation sector at all stages, including on this issue.
▸
Assessment & feedback
The Minister did not directly address maintaining a longer notice period but focused on passenger-first policies.
Forgive Me
Fully Engaged
Response accuracy