New Nuclear Sites 2025-11-26
2025-11-26
TAGS
Response quality
Questions & Answers
Q1
Partial Answer
▸
Context
The Scottish Government opposes new nuclear projects, citing ideological reasons. This opposition affects the consideration of Torness, Dounreay and Hunterston for future nuclear projects.
What discussions has the Secretary of State had with the SNP Government in Scotland, whose luddite approach and ideological blinkers prevent Torness, Dounreay and Hunterston from being considered for future nuclear projects—and all the jobs and investment that go with them?
This at least seems to be an occasion for which there is genuine cross-party consensus. Not only have we urged a different approach from the Scottish Government—and I do so again—but my right hon. Friend the Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero has already asked Great British Energy Nuclear to begin assessing Scotland’s capability for new build nuclear sites.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Urging A Different Approach
Not Providing Specific Details On Discussions
Response accuracy
Q2
Partial Answer
▸
Context
Renewables require significant investment to connect to the grid. Former nuclear sites like Hunterston, Torness and Dounreay could be suitable for new nuclear power stations.
Would the Secretary of State not agree that connecting renewables to the grid requires considerable expense, and would not the former nuclear sites of Hunterston, Torness and Dounreay make very suitable sites for new nuclear power stations, from which the Scottish people have benefited hugely in the past?
Of course, we would welcome the opportunity for advanced modular reactors, small modular reactors or new build nuclear at the Torness site, but the EDF management there says that the opposition from the Scottish Government is preventing equivalent investment of the kind that was recently announced for Torness’s sister plant in Hartlepool.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Stating Preference
Mentioning Edf Management'S View
Response accuracy
Q3
Partial Answer
▸
Context
SNP argues against new nuclear due to high costs. The Secretary of State is asked about the potential for reduced costs in small modular reactors.
A key plank of the SNP’s dogmatic argument against new nuclear is cost. Will the right hon. Gentleman find a quiet moment—perhaps when the winds fall light and the turbines stop—to point out to them to reduced costs of small modular reactors?
Of course, new technologies are emerging, as the hon. Lady recognises. We are delighted that Rolls-Royce is one company leading that new wave of nuclear technology. We do not even need to look to the future; we can look to the most recent past for occasions when the wind does not blow and the sun does not shine in Scotland.
▸
Assessment & feedback
Acknowledging New Technologies
Referencing Past Instances
Response accuracy